Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146771›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Definition and categorization of rural and assessment of realized access to care.

Whitney E Zahnd, Natalie Del Vecchio, Natoshia Askelson, Jan M Eberth, Robin C Vanderpool, Linda Overholser, Purnima Madhivanan, Rachel Hirschey, Jean Edward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Outpatient Care Fragmentation and Patient Satisfaction With Care.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rural-urban disparities in primary care and geographic continuity of care for children with medical complexity.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Access to pediatric trauma centres in Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  14. A novel approach to incorporate frontier areas into urban-rural geographic classifications: Integrated Metropolitan-to-Frontier Area Codes.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Rurality, Travel Time, and Neighborhood Socioeconomics on Patterns of Adjuvant Therapy Receipt among Patients with Endometrial Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  17. Diagnostic disparities in inborn errors of immunity: From clinical suspicion to diagnosis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  18. Deconstructing rurality to better "place" health data.International journal of geographical information science : IJGIS · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Overview of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and future clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Whitney E ZahndDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-8666
Natalie Del VecchioPublic Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Natoshia AskelsonDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Jan M EberthDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-4212
Robin C VanderpoolHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Linda OverholserDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Purnima MadhivananHealth Promotion Sciences Department, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Rachel HirscheySchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jean EdwardCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

Physical activity intervention co-created and pilot tested with African American Colorectal Cancer SurvivorsK23MD015719 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HIRSCHEY, RACHEL · 2021 to 2025
$795k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U13 DP000641NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006389NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006399NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006400NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006401NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006413NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD015719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how three measures of realized access to care vary by definitions and categorizations of "rural". DATA SOURCES: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data, a nationally representative survey assessing knowledge of health-related information, were used. Participants were categorized by county-based Urban Influence Codes (UICs), Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCCs), and census tract-based Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCAs). STUDY

designThree approaches were used across categories of UICs, RUCCs, and RUCAs: (1) non-metropolitan/metropolitan, (2) three-group categorization based upon population size, and (3) three-group categorization based on adjacency to metropolitan areas. Wald Chi-square tests evaluated differences in sociodemographic variables and three measures of realized access across three of Penchansky's "A's of access" and approaches. The three outcome measures included: having a regular provider (realized availability), self-reported "excellent" quality of care (realized acceptability), and self-report of the provider "always" spending enough time with you (provider attentiveness-realized accommodation). The average marginal effects corresponding to each outcome were calculated. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsN/A PRINCIPAL

findingsAll approaches indicated comparable variation in sociodemographics. In all approaches, RUCA-based categorizations showed differences in having a regular provider (e.g., 68.9% of non-metropolitan and 64.4% of metropolitan participants had a regular provider). This association was attenuated in multivariable analyses. No rural-urban differences in quality of care were seen in unadjusted or adjusted analyses regardless of approach. After adjustment for covariates, rural respondents reported greater provider attentiveness in some categorizations of rural compared with urban (e.g., non-metropolitan respondents reported 6.03 percentage point increase in probability of having an attentive provider [CI = 0.76-11.31%] compared with metropolitan).

conclusionsOur findings underscore the importance of considering multiple definitions of rural to understand access disparities and suggest that continued research is needed to examine the interplay between potential and realized access. These findings have implications for federal funding, resource allocation, and identifying health disparities.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRural PopulationHumansSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUrban Populationhealth serviceshealth services accessibilityrural populations

Identifiers

PMID35146771
PMCPMC9108055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.