Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146696›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2022

Long-Term Effectiveness of Three Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Resistant Chronic Migraine Patients Based on the MIDAS score.

Luigi Francesco Iannone, Davide Fattori, Silvia Benemei, Alberto Chiarugi, Pierangelo Geppetti, Francesco De Cesaris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05442008 (Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05442008 completednot on this map

Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine: a Real-life, Open-label, Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationRan2018 to 2021Enrolled53ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab 70/140 mg s.c.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. The first interim analysis of Italian patients enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Costs and use of antimigraine drugs in Italy: a ten-year analysis of national data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Tumor Innervation: From Bystander to Emerging Therapeutic Target for Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi Francesco IannoneSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Davide FattoriSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Silvia BenemeiHeadache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alberto ChiarugiSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Pierangelo GeppettiSection of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. pierangelo.geppetti@unifi.it.
Francesco De CesarisHeadache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCriteria, including clinical features and effective outcomes, for access and persistence of novel but costly treatments may vary between countries, thus affecting the health of patients. Monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs) for migraine treatment are currently prescribed following strict criteria.

objectiveThe aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of three anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, and fremanezumab) in consecutive resistant chronic migraine patients presenting at our Headache Center and the impact of criteria set by the Italian Medicines Agency to start and continue (achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] score) with treatment under the reimbursement program.

methodsA monocentric, prospective, cohort study was conducted, enrolling 203 severe (resistant to three or more preventive treatments) chronic migraine patients (84.7% with medication overuse) treated with erenumab (47.2%), galcanezumab (36.5%), or fremanezumab (16.3%), with up to 12 months follow-up. Patients completed a headache diary that included monthly migraine days (MMDs), number of analgesics and days with analgesic use, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires (MIDAS, Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6] questionnaires, and the Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale). Moreover, percentages of patients showing ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% reduction in MMDs (responder rates) were calculated at different follow-ups. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with 12-month follow-up. Potential predictors of response were assessed at different follow-ups.

resultsIn the overall population, all three anti-CGRP mAbs were similarly effective and dropouts were 17.2%. The percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (min-max 36.4-56.8%) and in monthly analgesic consumption (51.1-75.7%) was inferior to the percentage of patients who reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (89.5-100%). HIT-6 score was also consistently reduced at all follow-ups. In patients with a 12-month follow-up, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were also reduced at all follow-ups compared with baseline, with 84.4-100% of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score, and patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ranging from 36.4 to 66.6%. No severe adverse events were recorded. Fewer migraine days at baseline were associated with ≥ 50% response rate at 1 month and fewer MMDs, years of chronic migraine, and monthly analgesic use at 6 months.

conclusionIn resistant chronic migraine patients, anti-CGRP mAbs are effective and safe. A ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score seems to be the most advantageous outcome measure in this setting, which allows most severe migraine patients to persist with treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug MonitoringMigraine DisordersCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonistserenumabfremanezumabgalcanezumab

Identifiers

PMID35146696
PMCPMC8863684
OpenAlexW4211212370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.