ArticleCNS drugs2022
Long-Term Effectiveness of Three Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Resistant Chronic Migraine Patients Based on the MIDAS score.
Article in CNS drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05442008 (Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Early MIDAS Reduction at 3 Months as Predictor of Long-term Erenumab Treatment in Chronic Migraine: a Real-life, Open-label, Trial
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-marketing safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants: A systematic review of spontaneous reporting system data.Headache · 2026Pooled it
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Headache · 2026Pooled it
- CROATIAN GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFIC PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE WITH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES TARGETING CALCITONIN GENE-RELATED PEPTIDE (CGRP) (EPTINEZUMAB, FREMANEZUMAB, AND GALCANEZUMAB) OR THE CGRP RECEPTOR (ERENUMAB).Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Guideline
- Methodological considerations on real-world evidence studies of monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP-pathway for migraine: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- The first interim analysis of Italian patients enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Trial
- Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Costs and use of antimigraine drugs in Italy: a ten-year analysis of national data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- MIDAS and HIT-6 Questionnaires Versus Headache Diaries for Monitoring Treatment Response to Erenumab in Migraine: A REFORM Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- A Real-World Study of CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine: Long-Term Effectiveness and Treatment Adherence.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Real-World Experience with Anti-CGRP Pathway Monoclonal Antibodies in a Large United States Healthcare Plan: Results of the Migraine Signature Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Observational
- CGRP and Migraine: Real-World Insights and Future Therapeutic Directions.Annual review of medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating Treatment Success in CGRP Antibody Prophylaxis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Monthly Migraine Days, MIDAS Scores, and HIT-6 Scores.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Remote automated delivery of mechanical stimuli coupled to brain recordings in behaving mice.eLife · 2025Article
- Late response to anti-CGRP therapy for migraine.Pain management · 2025Review
- Tumor Innervation: From Bystander to Emerging Therapeutic Target for Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- One-Year Compliance After Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for Migraine Patients in a Real-World Setting: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Medication underuse in real-life practice: the impact of galcanezumab towards achieving very low frequency episodic migraine in a southeast Asian middle-income nation.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of nitinol vs. novel fully biodegradable occluders for transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in migraine treatment: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCriteria, including clinical features and effective outcomes, for access and persistence of novel but costly treatments may vary between countries, thus affecting the health of patients. Monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs) for migraine treatment are currently prescribed following strict criteria.
objectiveThe aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of three anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, and fremanezumab) in consecutive resistant chronic migraine patients presenting at our Headache Center and the impact of criteria set by the Italian Medicines Agency to start and continue (achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] score) with treatment under the reimbursement program.
methodsA monocentric, prospective, cohort study was conducted, enrolling 203 severe (resistant to three or more preventive treatments) chronic migraine patients (84.7% with medication overuse) treated with erenumab (47.2%), galcanezumab (36.5%), or fremanezumab (16.3%), with up to 12 months follow-up. Patients completed a headache diary that included monthly migraine days (MMDs), number of analgesics and days with analgesic use, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires (MIDAS, Headache Impact Test 6 [HIT-6] questionnaires, and the Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale). Moreover, percentages of patients showing ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% reduction in MMDs (responder rates) were calculated at different follow-ups. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with 12-month follow-up. Potential predictors of response were assessed at different follow-ups.
resultsIn the overall population, all three anti-CGRP mAbs were similarly effective and dropouts were 17.2%. The percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (min-max 36.4-56.8%) and in monthly analgesic consumption (51.1-75.7%) was inferior to the percentage of patients who reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (89.5-100%). HIT-6 score was also consistently reduced at all follow-ups. In patients with a 12-month follow-up, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores were also reduced at all follow-ups compared with baseline, with 84.4-100% of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score, and patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ranging from 36.4 to 66.6%. No severe adverse events were recorded. Fewer migraine days at baseline were associated with ≥ 50% response rate at 1 month and fewer MMDs, years of chronic migraine, and monthly analgesic use at 6 months.
conclusionIn resistant chronic migraine patients, anti-CGRP mAbs are effective and safe. A ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score seems to be the most advantageous outcome measure in this setting, which allows most severe migraine patients to persist with treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.