Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146628›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching.

Alistair Robson, Yarrow Scantling-Birch, Stuart Morton, Deepika Anbu, Scott Border

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alistair RobsonCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Mailpoint 845, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Yarrow Scantling-BirchCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Mailpoint 845, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Stuart MortonCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Mailpoint 845, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Deepika AnbuCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Mailpoint 845, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Scott BorderCentre for Learning Anatomical Sciences, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Mailpoint 845, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. s.border@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern medical curricula adopt the use self-directed learning approaches, which frequently include the use of technology enhanced learning resources. Often, students prefer those which are available via mobile devices because it can facilitate flexibility and autonomy with their learning, more so than with traditional modalities. Although the production value of resources may be appealing to users, those that work most effectively for education align well to existing pedagogies. One such pedagogy is the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. It is a framework that can be used to facilitate the construction of educational video, that can benefit learning gain through reducing the cognitive load.Although much research has been conducted on how information should be presented in video resources, there is very limited evidence within the subject of clinical anatomy and physiology or when applying different types of educational video, such as screencasts, or interactive video. In the field of anatomy education recent approaches have sought to standardize a robust methodology to evaluate digital resources. This procedure utilizes a combination of normalized learning gain and learner perceptions to gain an accurate picture of educational impact.The current study investigated the impact of both interactive educational videos and screencasts compared with traditional teaching techniques in the challenging subjects of histology and pain physiology. A quasi-randomized, cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 medical students enrolled at the University of Southampton. Sixty fourth- and fifth-year students assessed the histology resources, and 75 second-year students assessed the pain histology resources. Participants were randomly assigned to either a text-based resource, interactive video, or screencast group. Outcomes measured were: 1. Normalized knowledge gain (and retention) assessed using one-best-answer multiple choice question tests 2. Student perceptions using 1-10 Likert-scale style questionnaires. A significant improvement in mean normalized knowledge gain was observed for all teaching modalities. For pain physiology, the means were: Text-49.0% (n = 23), interactive video-70.1% (n = 26), and screencast-53.8% (n = 26). For all learning gains, P < 0.001. For histology, there was a mean normalized learning gain for text-80.0% (n = 20), interactive video-74.4% (n = 20), and screencast groups-68.3% (n = 20). For all learning gains, P < 0.001.For pain physiology resources, interactive videos significantly improved learning gain compared to the screencast (P < 0.05) and the text resource groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between those who used the text or screencast resources. There was also no significant difference in knowledge retention between the different teaching methods for each subject.Following teaching, all three teaching modalities had similar effects on student confidence in the subjects, desire for educational channels dedicated to each topic, and preference for locally produced vs. externally produced videos. These findings have the potential to inform educators on which types of resources to create or to select for their students to have the best impact on learning.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHumansLearningAnatomy educationBlended learningEducational videoPhysiology educationScreencastsTechnology enhanced learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.