Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146620›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Artificial Intelligence: Innovation to Assist in the Identification of Sono-anatomy for Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anaesthesia.

James Lloyd, Robert Morse, Alasdair Taylor, David Phillips, Helen Higham, David Burckett-St Laurent, James Bowness

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in regional anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James LloydDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Robert MorseMachine Learning Software Engineer, Intelligent Ultrasound Limited, Cardiff, UK.
Alasdair TaylorNHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
David PhillipsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Helen HighamNuffield Division of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
David Burckett-St LaurentDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
James BownessDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK. james.bowness@jesus.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) involves the targeted deposition of local anaesthesia to inhibit the function of peripheral nerves. Ultrasound allows the visualisation of nerves and the surrounding structures, to guide needle insertion to a perineural or fascial plane end point for injection. However, it is challenging to develop the necessary skills to acquire and interpret optimal ultrasound images. Sound anatomical knowledge is required and human image analysis is fallible, limited by heuristic behaviours and fatigue, while its subjectivity leads to varied interpretation even amongst experts. Therefore, to maximise the potential benefit of ultrasound guidance, innovation in sono-anatomical identification is required.Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly infiltrating many aspects of everyday life. Advances related to medicine have been slower, in part because of the regulatory approval process needing to thoroughly evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of new devices. One area of AI to show significant promise is computer vision (a branch of AI dealing with how computers interpret the visual world), which is particularly relevant to medical image interpretation. AI includes the subfields of machine learning and deep learning, techniques used to interpret or label images. Deep learning systems may hold potential to support ultrasound image interpretation in UGRA but must be trained and validated on data prior to clinical use.Review of the current UGRA literature compares the success and generalisability of deep learning and non-deep learning approaches to image segmentation and explains how computers are able to track structures such as nerves through image frames. We conclude this review with a case study from industry (ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block; Intelligent Ultrasound Limited). This includes a more detailed discussion of the AI approach involved in this system and reviews current evidence of the system performance.The authors discuss how this technology may be best used to assist anaesthetists and what effects this may have on the future of learning and practice of UGRA. Finally, we discuss possible avenues for AI within UGRA and the associated implications.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionArtificial IntelligenceHumansPeripheral NervesUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalAnatomyArtificial intelligenceBlocksComputer visionConvolutional neural networkMachine learningRegional anaesthesiaSono-anatomyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35146620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.