Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146617›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Methods and Applications of 3D Patient-Specific Virtual Reconstructions in Surgery.

Jordan Fletcher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances in 3D printing applications for CNS tumours.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jordan FletcherSt Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK. jordan.fletcher@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D modelling has been highlighted as one of the key digital technologies likely to impact surgical practice in the next decade. 3D virtual models are reconstructed using traditional 2D imaging data through either direct volume or indirect surface rendering. One of the principal benefits of 3D visualisation in surgery relates to improved anatomical understanding-particularly in cases involving highly variable complex structures or where precision is required.Workflows begin with imaging segmentation which is a key step in 3D reconstruction and is defined as the process of identifying and delineating structures of interest. Fully automated segmentation will be essential if 3D visualisation is to be feasibly incorporated into routine clinical workflows; however, most algorithmic solutions remain incomplete. 3D models must undergo a range of processing steps prior to visualisation, which typically include smoothing, decimation and colourization. Models used for illustrative purposes may undergo more advanced processing such as UV unwrapping, retopology and PBR texture mapping.Clinical applications are wide ranging and vary significantly between specialities. Beyond pure anatomical visualisation, 3D modelling offers new methods of interacting with imaging data; enabling patient-specific simulations/rehearsal, Computer-Aided Design (CAD) of custom implants/cutting guides and serves as the substrate for augmented reality (AR) enhanced navigation.3D may enable faster, safer surgery with reduced errors and complications, ultimately resulting in improved patient outcomes. However, the relative effectiveness of 3D visualisation remains poorly understood. Future research is needed to not only define the ideal application, specific user and optimal interface/platform for interacting with models but also identify means by which we can systematically evaluate the efficacy of 3D modelling in surgery.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityImaging, Three-DimensionalHumans3D-modellingSegmentationSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.