Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146611›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

Visible Light Imaging: Clinical Aspects with an Emphasis on Medical Photography-a HIMSS-SIIM Enterprise Imaging Community Whitepaper.

Cheryl A Petersilge, Julie McDonald, Matthew Bishop, Laurence Yudkovitch, Caitlin Treuting, Alexander J Towbin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Implementing a Photodocumentation Program.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sociodemographic reporting in videomics research: a review of practices in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheryl A PetersilgeUPMC Department of Radiology, 200 Lothrop Street, UPMC Montefiore, Room NE 538, PA, Pittsburgh, 15213, USA. cherylapetersilgemd@gmail.com.
Julie McDonaldHyland HealthCare, Westlake, OH, 44145, USA.
Matthew BishopEnterprise Solutions Architect - Imaging, UnityPoint Health, Bettendorf, IA, USA.
Laurence YudkovitchiCAD, 98 Spit Brook Road, Suite 100, Nashua, NH, 03062, USA.
Caitlin TreutingClinical Photography, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5013, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Alexander J TowbinDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5013, OH, 45229, Cincinnati, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodocumentation is a subset of visible light imaging and is an important growing segment of enterprise imaging. Medical videography is another subset of visible light imaging that shares many of the challenges of photodocumentation. Medical photographs are used to document clinical conditions, support diagnosis, guide, and document procedures and to enable collaboration among colleagues. They also play a significant role in patient engagement and are a mechanism for patients to share information with their provider without the need for a clinical office visit. The content of medical photographs raises issues for acquisition, management, storage, and access. Medical photographs may contain protected health information, and these images benefit from the standardized, secure processes inherent in any enterprise imaging program. The ability to securely acquire images on mobile, and sometimes personally owned devices, is a necessity. In addition to containing protected health information, photograph content can be sensitive or gruesome or the images may be used for forensic purposes. These types of images require additional protections. Access to these images should be role-based and auditable. To properly identify photographs and to convey information about their acquisition parameters new metadata requirements and mechanisms for its association with the imaging files are evolving. Institutional policies need to be developed to define the organization's requirements for medical photography, including consent processes. Existing policies such as those defining the designated record set and legal health record should address the management of medical photography.

Indexed as

LightPhotographyHumansEnterprise imagingMedical photographyMedical videographyPhotodocumentationVisible light imaging

Identifiers

PMID35146611
PMCPMC9156602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.