Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146534›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2022

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) for severe respiratory failure in adult cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter analysis.

Matthias Kochanek, Jan Kochanek, Boris Böll, Dennis A Eichenauer, Gernot Beutel, Hendrik Bracht, Stephan Braune, Florian Eisner, Sigrun Friesecke, Ulf Günther and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and Stem Cell Transplant in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with Pulmonary Involvement.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 19 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthias KochanekFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. Matthias.Kochanek@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4651
Jan KochanekFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Boris BöllFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Dennis A EichenauerFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Gernot BeutelDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hendrik BrachtDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stephan BrauneDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian EisnerMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sigrun FrieseckeDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ulf GüntherKlinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Gottfried HeinzDepartment Medicine II, Intensive Care Unit 13H3, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HallekFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christian KaragiannidisStädtische Kliniken Köln Merheim, University Witten/Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus KogelmannKlinikum Emden, Emden, Germany.
Pia LebiedzEvangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Philipp M LepperDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Tobias LiebregtsDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Catherina LueckDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ralf M MuellenbachUniversity, Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias HansenRobert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Gerlingen and Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christian PutensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter SchellongowskiDepartment Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jens-Christian ScheweDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kathrin Schumann-StoiberKlinikverbund Allgäu, Klinik Immenstadt, Immenstadt, Germany.
Frederik SeilerDepartment of Internal Medicine V - Pneumology, Allergology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Peter SpiethUniversity Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Steffen Weber-CarstensDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Charite, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel BrodieCenter for Acute Respiratory Failure, New York-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Elie AzoulayMédecine Intensive Et Réanimation, APHP, Saint-Louis Hospital and Paris University, Paris, France.
Alexander Shimabukuro-VornhagenFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESaarland University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg · DEKliniken der Stadt Köln · DEKlinikum Oldenburg · DEMedical University of Graz · ATNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USRobert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe question of whether cancer patients with severe respiratory failure benefit from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) remains unanswered. We, therefore, analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes of a large cohort of cancer patients treated with vv-ECMO with the aim to identify prognostic factors.

methods297 cancer patients from 19 German and Austrian hospitals who underwent vv-ECMO between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A multivariable cox proportional hazards analysis for overall survival was performed. In addition, a propensity score-matched analysis and a latent class analysis were conducted.

resultsPatients had a median age of 56 (IQR 44-65) years and 214 (72%) were males. 159 (54%) had a solid tumor and 138 (47%) a hematologic malignancy. The 60-day overall survival rate was 26.8% (95% CI 22.1-32.4%). Low platelet count (HR 0.997, 95% CI 0.996-0.999; p = 0.0001 per 1000 platelets/µl), elevated lactate levels (HR 1.048, 95% CI 1.012-1.084; p = 0.0077), and disease status (progressive disease [HR 1.871, 95% CI 1.081-3.238; p = 0.0253], newly diagnosed [HR 1.571, 95% CI 1.044-2.364; p = 0.0304]) were independent adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. A propensity score-matched analysis with patients who did not receive ECMO treatment showed no significant survival advantage for treatment with ECMO.

conclusionThe overall survival of cancer patients who require vv-ECMO is poor. This study shows that the value of vv-ECMO in cancer patients with respiratory failure is still unclear and further research is needed. The risk factors identified in the present analysis may help to better select patients who may benefit from vv-ECMO.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationNeoplasmsRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAcute respiratory distress syndromeARDSCancerECMOExtracorporeal circulationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationRespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID35146534
PMCPMC8866383
OpenAlexW4211020227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.