Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146505›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2022

Ten-Year Survival of Children With Congenital Anomalies: A European Cohort Study.

Svetlana V Glinianaia, Judith Rankin, Anna Pierini, Alessio Coi, Michele Santoro, Joachim Tan, Abigail Reid, Ester Garne, Maria Loane, Joanne Given and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prenatal detection and outcome of major heart defects in a country with universal screening.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.

Svetlana V GlinianaiaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Judith RankinFaculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anna PieriniUnit of Epidemiology of Rare diseases and Congenital Anomalies, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Alessio CoiUnit of Epidemiology of Rare diseases and Congenital Anomalies, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Michele SantoroUnit of Epidemiology of Rare diseases and Congenital Anomalies, Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Joachim TanPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Abigail ReidPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Ester GarnePediatric Department, Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark.
Maria LoaneFaculty of Life & Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Joanne GivenFaculty of Life & Health Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Clara Cavero-CarbonellRare Diseases Research Unit, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region, Valencia, Spain.
Hermien E K de WalleDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Miriam GattMalta Congenital Anomalies Registry, Directorate for Health Information and Research, Tal-Pietà, Malta.
Mika GisslerInformation Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Helsinki, Finland.
Anna HeinoInformation Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Helsinki, Finland.
Babak KhoshnoodObstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM-INRA, Université de Paris, Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Paris, France.
Kari KlungsøyrDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nathalie LelongObstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM-INRA, Université de Paris, Center of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Paris, France.
Amanda J NevilleCenter for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Daniel S ThayerFaculty of Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
David TuckerPublic Health Wales, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Stine K UrhøjPediatric Department, Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark.
Diana WellesleyWessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Oscar ZurriagaRare Diseases Research Unit, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region, Valencia, Spain.
Joan K MorrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
St George's, University of London · GBFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESLillebaelt Hospital · DKNational Research Council · ITNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBCentre de Recherche Épidémiologie et StatistiqueInserm · FRIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITMinistry for Health · MTNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOPrincess Anne Hospital · GBPublic Health Wales · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the survival up to age 10 for children born alive with a major congenital anomaly (CA).

methodsThis population-based linked cohort study (EUROlinkCAT) linked data on live births from 2005 to 2014 from 13 European CA registries with mortality data. Pooled Kaplan-Meier survival estimates up to age 10 were calculated for these children (77 054 children with isolated structural anomalies and 4011 children with Down syndrome).

resultsThe highest mortality of children with isolated structural CAs was within infancy, with survival of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.6%-98.1%) and 96.9% (95% CI: 96.0%-97.7%) at age 1 and 10, respectively. The 10-year survival exceeded 90% for the majority of specific CAs (27 of 32), with considerable variations between CAs of different severity. Survival of children with a specific isolated anomaly was higher than in all children with the same anomaly when those with associated anomalies were included. For children with Down syndrome, the 10-year survival was significantly higher for those without associated cardiac or digestive system anomalies (97.6%; 95% CI: 96.5%-98.7%) compared with children with Down syndrome associated with a cardiac anomaly (92.3%; 95% CI: 89.4%-95.3%), digestive system anomaly (92.8%; 95% CI: 87.7%-98.2%), or both (88.6%; 95% CI: 83.2%-94.3%).

conclusionsTen-year survival of children born with congenital anomalies in Western Europe from 2005 to 2014 was relatively high. Reliable information on long-term survival of children born with specific CAs is of major importance for parents of these children and for the health care professionals involved in their care.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesDown SyndromeHeart Defects, CongenitalChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantLive BirthPregnancyPrevalenceRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35146505
OpenAlexW3216748487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.