ArticleHGG advances2022
Prediction of breast cancer risk based on flow variant analysis of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Article in HGG advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of PBMCs in breast cancer: detection, treatment evaluation and prognosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Cancer Risk C (CR-C), a functional genomics test is a sensitive and rapid test for germline mismatch repair deficiency.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying women at high risk for developing breast cancer is potentially lifesaving. Patients with pathogenic genetic variants can embark on a program of surveillance for early detection, chemoprevention, and/or prophylactic surgery. Newly diagnosed cancer patients can also use the results of gene panel sequencing to make decisions about surgery; therefore, rapid turnaround time for results is critical. Cancer Risk B (CR-B), a test that uses flow variant assays to assess the effects of variants in the DNA double-strand break repair, was applied to two groups of subjects who underwent coincidental gene panel testing, thereby allowing an assessment of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and utility for annotating variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The test was compared in matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and lymphoblastoid cells (LCLs) and tested for rescue in LCLs with gene transfer. The CR-B phenotype demonstrated a bimodal distribution: CR-B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.