ArticleSTAR protocols2022
Identifying patients and assessing variant pathogenicity for an autosomal dominant disease-driving gene.
Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alpha-synuclein abundance and localization are regulated by the RNA-binding protein PUMILIO1.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Cross-Sectional Analysis of Outer Retinal Tubulation in Inherited Retinal Diseases: A Multicenter Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- CERT1 mutations perturb human development by disrupting sphingolipid homeostasis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Relating pathogenic loss-of-function mutations in humans to their evolutionary fitness costs.eLife · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying a disease gene and determining its causality in patients can be challenging. Here, we present an approach to predicting the pathogenicity of deletions and missense variants for an autosomal dominant gene. We provide online resources for identifying patients and determining constraint metrics to isolate the causal gene among several candidates encompassed in a shared region of deletion. We also provide instructions for optimizing functional annotation programs that may be otherwise inaccessible to a nonexpert or novice in computational approaches. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Gennarino et al. (2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.