Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146379›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2022

Prenatal telemedicine during COVID-19: patterns of use and barriers to access.

Allie Morgan, Daisy Goodman, Julia Vinagolu-Baur, Ilana Cass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Community-Level Internet Connectivity and Utilization of Maternal Telehealth.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Telehealth to Address Preventable Maternal Deaths: A Call to Action.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reasons for Not Pursuing Virtual Prenatal Care in 2020 Through 2021 and Policy Implications.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allie MorganGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Daisy GoodmanGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Julia Vinagolu-BaurDivision of Continuing Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ilana CassDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate patient experience with a prenatal telemedicine visit and identify barriers to accessing telemedicine among rural pregnant people in northern New England during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a postvisit electronic survey of pregnant people who successfully participated in a prenatal telemedicine visit at a rural academic medical center in Northern New England. Nineteen questions were included in 5 domains: (1) engagement with prenatal care; (2) barriers to telemedicine and in person healthcare; (3) experience of prenatal care; (4) remote pregnancy surveillance tools; and (5) sources of COVID-19 information.

resultsResponses were obtained from 164 pregnant people. Forty percent of participants had participated in an audio-only telemedicine visit, and 60% in a video telemedicine visit. The visit was easy or somewhat easy for 79% of respondents and somewhat difficult or difficult for 6.8%. The most common barrier to accessing telemedicine was poor internet or phone connectivity, followed by childcare responsibilities, lack of equipment, and lack of privacy. Participants also engaged in additional remote prenatal care including phone calls with registered nurses (7.6%), communication with the obstetrics team through a secure health messaging portal (21.1%), and home health monitoring (76.3%). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsIn this survey, evaluating the experience of pregnant people participating in a prenatal telemedicine visit during the COVID-19 pandemic, respondents had a positive experience with telemedicine overall, but also identified significant barriers to participation including issues with connectivity and lack of equipment for the visit. Most participants used telemedicine in combination with other tools for remote self-care.

Indexed as

barriers to carecommunicationCOVID-19obstetricspregnancytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35146379
PMCPMC8822407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.