Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146360›Full record

ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2021

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) clinical pharmacology.

Giovanni Di Perri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni Di PerriInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Torino, School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.
Torino e-district · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tenofovir today exists in two pharmaceutical forms, such as Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and the newer Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). The two different salts are required in order to promote intestinal absorption of the active molecule (TFV). Once absorbed the distribution of TFV into compartments is driven by the salt to which the drug is conjugated; in case of TDF, following absorption most of TFV is cleared from its link with the salt and the drug is widely distributed into different tissues, while in case of TAF the reverse is true as TFV remains mostly associated to its alafenamide salt and its distribution is restricted to cells with high carboxyesterase and catepsin A activity, such as hepatocytes and lymphocytes. This generates higher plasma levels of TFV in case of TDF while in the case of TFV much higher intracellular concentrations in target cells are achieved. The main reason for TAF development was to reduce the impact of the drug on proximal renal function and this was actually obtained by the much lower plasma concentration of TFV. Numerous clinical trials consistently demonstrated the significant lesser impact of TAF vs TDF on both renal function and structural bone integrity.

Indexed as

Low-molecular weight proteinProximal renal tubuleTenfovir alafenamide (TAF)Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)Tenofovir (TFV)

Identifiers

PMID35146360
PMCPMC8805468
OpenAlexW4200465601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.