ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2021
Complicated carbapenem-resistant infections: a treatment pathway analysis in Italian sites.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in infections caused by Difficult-to-Treat Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-world data in Greece.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Article
- Bloodstream infections and antibiotic resistance patterns: a six-year surveillance study from southern Italy.Pathogens and global health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEfforts to curb a growing prevalence of carbapenem resistance are prominent worldwide and especially in countries where high levels of carbapenem resistance are reported, such as Italy. Complicated infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), are often caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) bacteria and as such, these infection sites and their causative bacteria are important areas of focus for healthcare practitioners seeking to follow good antimicrobial stewardship practices. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical management and associated clinical and economic outcomes of patients with cUTI, cIAI, and HABP/VABP resulting from CRGN bacteria in Italy.
methodsWe first conducted a hospital survey focusing on Gram-negative infections and their antibacterial susceptibility profile in four participating Italian hospitals. The second part of the study involved a non-interventional, retrospective single cohort chart review of 100 patients with cUTI, cIAI, or HABP/VABP caused by CRGN bacteria, in which patient characteristics, index hospitalization characteristics, infection characteristics, patient outcomes, treatment pathways, and healthcare resource use were assessed.
resultsThe hospital survey demonstrated carbapenem resistance in approximately 17% of complicated infections, mostly associated with
conclusionOur results reflect the considerable burden associated with complicated CRGN infections in Italy and the limitations in current treatment strategies. Our study pinpoints potential areas for improvement. For example, regular and detailed local surveillance and state of the art microbial diagnostic capabilities might aid and hasten clinical decision-making and facilitate improved antimicrobial stewardship when treating complex CRGN infections. New therapeutic options which more appropriately address CRGN infections may assist in improving outcomes which are important to both patients and healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.