ArticleJournal of health monitoring2021
German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) - Background and methodology.
Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Environmental burden of disease resulting from long-term nitrogen dioxide exposure in Germany.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Physical activity-related health competence differs by social and health-related factors: findings from a nationwide population-based study in Germany.BMC public health · 2026Article
- [Utilisation of dental check-ups in Germany-prevalence and trends based on routine statutory health insurance data].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
- A comparison of contact patterns derived from the population structure in agent-based models and empirical contact survey data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Poverty and health - does parenthood matter? Trends in income inequality in self-rated health among parents and non-parents in Germany from 2009 to 2024.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Trends in depressive symptoms in Germany's adult population 2008-2023.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and trends in self-reported hearing difficulties among adults in Germany: Results from the GEDA study.Journal of health monitoring · 2026Article
- Assessing Unmet Need for Mental Healthcare Among Adults in Germany - Results from a Nationwide Study with Data Linkage.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Which population groups are more likely to get too little sleep? Results of the 'German Health Update' (GEDA 2023).Journal of health monitoring · 2026Article
- Weighting strategy and selection analysis in the panel 'Health in Germany': methods and results for the 2024 annual survey.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Physical activity in Germany: Discrepancy between high societal expectation and actual activity levels in old age.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Depressive and anxiety symptoms among adults in Germany: Results from the RKI Panel 'Health in Germany' 2024.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Background and Methodology of the 2024 annual survey from the panel 'Health in Germany' by the Robert Koch Institute.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute - Effects of a change in study design on sample composition and prevalence estimates due to the start of the 'Health in Germany' Panel.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Income, Educational Level, and Depressive Symptoms in a Time of Multiple Crises: Trends Revealed by High-Frequency Mental Health Surveillance in Germany, 2019–2024.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
- Sex-specific differences in urinary incontinence associated factors in older adults: an analysis of the German health update study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS).World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Self-reported height and weight: timeliness and source of the participant information.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Reassessment of alcohol consumption in Germany - Which population groups are at increased risk of disease?Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Placing smoking prevalence in the context of tobacco control measures in Europe.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Consumer Wearable Usage to Collect Health Data Among Adults Living in Germany: Nationwide Observational Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Between April 2019 and September 2020, 23,001 people aged 15 or over responded to questions about their health and living conditions for the German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). The results are representative of the German resident population aged 15 or above. The response rate was 21.6%. The study used a questionnaire based on the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), which was carried out in all EU member states. EHIS consists of four modules on health status, health care provision, health determinants, and socioeconomic variables. The data are collected in a harmonised manner and therefore have a high degree of international comparability. They constitute an important source of information for European health policy and health reporting and are made available by the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat). They also form the basis of the Federal Health Reporting undertaken in Germany. Data collection began in April 2019, just under a year before the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and continued into its initial phase, as of March 2020. As such, data from the current GEDA wave can also be used to conduct research into the health impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.