Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146298›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2020

Socioeconomic inequalities and COVID-19 - A review of the current international literature.

Benjamin Wachtler, Niels Michalski, Enno Nowossadeck, Michaela Diercke, Morten Wahrendorf, Claudia Santos-Hövener, Thomas Lampert, Jens Hoebel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin WachtlerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Niels MichalskiRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Enno NowossadeckRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Michaela DierckeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
Morten WahrendorfUniversity of Düsseldorf Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society.
Claudia Santos-HövenerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Thomas LampertRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jens HoebelRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Robert Koch Institute · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social epidemiological research describes correlations between socioeconomic status and the population's risk to become diseased or die. Little research of such correlations for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 has so far been conducted. This scoping review provides an overview of the international research literature. Out of the 138 publications found, 46 were later included in the analysis. For the US and the UK, the reported findings indicate the presence of socioeconomic inequalities in infection risks as well as the severity of the course of the disease, with socioeconomically less privileged populations being hit harder. There are far fewer findings for Germany to date, as is the case for most other European countries. However, the scant evidence available so far already indicates that social inequalities are a factor in COVID-19. Most of these analyses have been ecological studies with only few studies considering socioeconomic inequalities at the individual level. Such studies at the individual level are particularly desirable as they could help to increase our understanding of the underlying pathways that lead to the development of inequalities in infection risks and the severity of disease and thereby could provide a basis to counteract the further exacerbation of health inequalities.

Indexed as

COVID-19HEALTH INEQUALITYLITERATURE REVIEWSARS-COV-2

Identifiers

PMID35146298
PMCPMC8734114
OpenAlexW3093183334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.