Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146280›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2021

Care for the chronically ill in Germany - The challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Christa Scheidt-Nave, Benjamin Barnes, Ann-Kristin Beyer, Markus A Busch, Ulfert Hapke, Christin Heidemann, Maren Imhoff, Rebekka Mumm, Rebecca Paprott, Henriette Steppuhn and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Telemedicine in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review Based on Current Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christa Scheidt-NaveRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Benjamin BarnesRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Ann-Kristin BeyerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Markus A BuschRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Ulfert HapkeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Christin HeidemannRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Maren ImhoffRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Rebekka MummRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Rebecca PaprottRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Henriette SteppuhnRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Petra von Berenberg-GosslerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Klaus KraywinkelRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Robert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is posing major challenges to the health care sector. This scoping review compiles evidence concerning changes to health care service availability and utilisation as well as possible impacts on health for selected groups of chronically ill people in Germany. The focus is on cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and mental disorders. Most empirical data available concerned inpatient care and showed a clear decline in the utilisation of inpatient treatments in March and April 2020 in the areas of oncology and cardiology as well as in mental health. For cardiovascular emergencies such as heart attack and stroke, a decline was observed especially regarding less serious cases. Although there were indications of treatment delays, there was no evidence thus far that emergency care had been generally compromised due to adjustments to inpatient care capacities. In the outpatient setting, extensive adjustments to health care services availability were observed for all disease groups considered. Overall, very limited empirical data were available. In particular, hardly any data were available on how changes in care impacted population health. There is an urgent need for continuous surveillance and evaluation based on health care and epidemiological data.

Indexed as

CARECARE UPTAKECHRONIC DISEASECOVID-19 PANDEMICGERMANYHEALTH CONSEQUENCES

Identifiers

PMID35146280
PMCPMC8734154
OpenAlexW3129247807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.