Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146260›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2019

European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2 - Background and study methodology.

Birte Hintzpeter, Jonas D Finger, Jennifer Allen, Ronny Kuhnert, Stefanie Seeling, Jürgen Thelen, Cornelia Lange

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outcome evaluation of osteoporosis patient education: an observational study comparing an intervention group and matched control group.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birte HintzpeterRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jonas D FingerFormerly Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jennifer AllenRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Ronny KuhnertRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Stefanie SeelingRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jürgen ThelenRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Cornelia LangeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Robert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific assessment of health issues, the design and further development of political guidelines as well as the targeted planning of measures in the European Union (EU) require data on population health. For this reason, all EU Member States regularly collect data on the health status, provision of healthcare, health determinants and socioeconomic situation of their respective populations in the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS). Participants are at least 15 years old and live in private households. The second wave of EHIS (EHIS 2) was conducted between 2013 and 2015. For EHIS 2, each EU Member State drew a nationally representative population sample from population registers, censuses, dwelling registers or other statistical or administrative sources. Data collection modes within individual EU Member States were used, according to nationally established methods, including the use of mixed-mode surveys. Across all EU Member States, data collection took an average of eight months to complete. Member States made considerable efforts to achieve the highest possible response rates. The harmonised EHIS data collected are highly comparable and constitute an important information base for European health policy and health reporting.

Indexed as

EHIS 2EUEUROPEAN COMPARISONHEALTH MONITORINGSTUDY METHODOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID35146260
PMCPMC8734125
OpenAlexW4210971358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.