Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146253›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2019

Concepts for migration-sensitive health monitoring.

Maria Schumann, Katja Kajikhina, Antonino Polizzi, Navina Sarma, Jens Hoebel, Marleen Bug, Susanne Bartig, Thomas Lampert, Claudia Santos-Hövener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Results and Strategies for a Diversity-Oriented Public Health Monitoring in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Racism against healthcare users in inpatient care: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria SchumannRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Katja KajikhinaRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Antonino PolizziRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Navina SarmaRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jens HoebelRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Marleen BugRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Susanne BartigRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Thomas LampertRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Claudia Santos-HövenerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to microcensus data, nearly one quarter of the German population has a migration background. This means that either themselves or at least one parent was born without German citizenship. Based on the currently available data and due to the underrepresentation of specific population groups, representative findings on the health of the total population residing in Germany are only possible to a limited degree. Against this backdrop, the Robert Koch Institute initiated the Improving Health Monitoring in Migrant Populations (IMIRA) project. The project aims to establish a migration-sensitive health monitoring system and to better represent people with a migration background in health surveys conducted by the Robert Koch Institute. In this context it is crucial to review and further develop relevant migration-sensitive concepts and appropriate surveying instruments. To achieve this, the concepts of acculturation, discrimination, religion and subjective social status were selected. This article theoretically embeds these concepts. Furthermore, we describe their application in epidemiology as well as provide a proposal on how to measure and operationalise these concepts. Moreover, recommendations for action are provided regarding the potential application of these concepts in health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute.

Indexed as

ACCULTURATIONDISCRIMINATIONHEALTH MONITORINGMIGRATIONSUBJECTIVE SOCIAL STATUS

Identifiers

PMID35146253
PMCPMC8734173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.