ArticleJournal of health monitoring2019
Social inequality and diabetes mellitus - developments over time among the adult population in Germany.
Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal effect of diabetes duration on productivity by socio-economic position in Germany between 2009 and 2021.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of type 2 diabetes from 2011 to 2023 by regional socioeconomic deprivation in Germany: an ecological study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Socio-economic inequalities in the association between diabetes and labour force participation in Germany: A repeated cross-sectional study.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2025Article
- Diabetes surveillance - Laying the groundwork for non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- Type 2 diabetes among people with selected citizenships in Germany: risk, healthcare, complications.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Germany: Temporal trend and differences by regional socioeconomic deprivation.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- Intersectional analysis of social disparities in type 2 diabetes risk among adults in Germany: results from a nationwide population-based survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Diabetes mellitus and comorbidities - A cross-sectional study with control group based on nationwide ambulatory claims data.Journal of health monitoring · 2021Article
- Population with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 in Germany. Analyses from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.Journal of health monitoring · 2021Article
- Social inequalities in mild and severe myocardial infarction: how large is the gap in health expectancies?BMC public health · 2021Article
- Patterns and associated factors of diabetes self-management: Results of a latent class analysis in a German population-based study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Editorial: Diabetes surveillance in Germany - status and perspectives.Journal of health monitoring · 2019Article
- Association between regional deprivation and type 2 diabetes incidence in Germany.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The connection between social disadvantage and the presence of known diabetes and specific risk factors is well documented. This article summarises the results from the Robert Koch Institute examination surveys that were conducted between 1997 and 1999 as well as 2008 and 2011 to address social inequality - operationalised by level of education - with regard to prevalences of known and unknown diabetes, risk of diabetes and care of diabetes as well as their development over time. Both survey periods showed that the low education group has higher prevalences of known and unkown diabetes as well as a higher risk of developing diabetes within the next five years compared to the medium and high education group. Over time, prevalence tended to increase for known diabetes and to decrease for unknown diabetes for all education groups. For the 5-year diabetes risk, only the high education group showed a clear decrease over time. The chosen indicators of diabetes care indicated no clear differences between education groups and an improvement of diabetes care over time. For some indicators of care (foot examination, statins), improvements were only seen in the low education group. In conclusion, social inequalities in the prevalence of known and unknown diabetes as well as in diabetes risk remain in Germany; for the indicators of care, however, no clear education gradient is evident. Over time, inequality regarding the prevalence of diabetes has not increased further. However, with regard to diabetes risk, inequality has become slightly more evident. For individual care indicators, improvements are limited to specific education groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.