Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146127›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

The role of endometrial B cells in normal endometrium and benign female reproductive pathologies: a systematic review.

Mengni Shen, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Gabriela Leon, Ana Kisovar, Pedro Melo, Krina Zondervan, Ingrid Granne, Jennifer Southcombe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Primary Endometrial Lymphomas: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Eutopic Endometrium Immune Changes Involved in Development and Progression of Endometriosis: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Endometriosis and adenomyosis unveiled through single-cell glasses.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Endometriosis in the era of precision medicine and impact on sexual and reproductive health across the lifespan and in diverse populations.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengni ShenNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth O'DonnellNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabriela LeonNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ana KisovarNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pedro MeloTommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Krina ZondervanNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ingrid GranneNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-5723
Jennifer SouthcombeNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-650X
University of Oxford · GBMiscarriage Association · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are the similarities and differences in endometrial B cells in the normal human endometrium and benign reproductive pathologies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometrial B cells typically constitute <5% of total endometrial CD45 WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: B cells are vitally important in the mucosal immune environment and have been extensively characterized in secondary lymphoid organs and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), with the associated microenvironment germinal centre. However, in the endometrium, B cells are largely overlooked, despite the crucial link between autoimmunity and reproductive pathologies and the fact that B cells are present in normal endometrium and benign female reproductive pathologies, scattered or in the form of lymphoid aggregates (LAs). A comprehensive summary of current data investigating B cells will facilitate our understanding of endometrial B cells in the endometrial mucosal immune environment. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This systematic review retrieved relevant studies from four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and CINAHL) from database inception until November 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThe search strategy combined the use of subject headings and relevant text words related to 'endometrium', 'B cells' and B-cell derivatives, such as 'antibody' and 'immunoglobulin'. Non-benign diseases were excluded using cancer-related free-text terms, and searches were limited to the English language and human subjects. Only peer-reviewed research papers were included. Each paper was graded as 'Good', 'Fair' or 'Poor' quality based on the NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA quality assessment scale. Only 'Good' quality papers were included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty-seven studies met the selection criteria and were included in this review: 10 cross-sectional studies investigated B cells in the normal endometrium; and 17 case-control studies compared the characteristics of endometrial B cells in control and benign female reproductive pathologies including endometritis, endometriosis, infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial polyps and uterine fibroids. In all studies, B cells were present in the endometrium, scattered or in the form of LAs. CD20 LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although only 'good' quality papers were included in this systematic review, there were variations in patients' age, diagnostic criteria for different diseases and sample collection time among included studies. Additionally, a large number of the included studies only used immunohistochemistry as the identification method for endometrial B cells, which may fail to provide an accurate representation of the numbers of endometrial B cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsHistological studies found that endometrial B cells are either scattered or surrounded by T cells in LAs: the latter structure seems to be under hormonal control throughout the menstrual cycle and resembles TLSs that have been observed in other tissues. Further characterization of endometrial B cells and LAs could offer insights to endometrial B-cell function, particularly in the context of autoimmune-associated pathologies, such as endometriosis. Additionally, clinicians should be aware of the limited value of diagnosing plasma cell infiltration using only CD138. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by Finox Biotech. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO in January 2020 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020152915).

Indexed as

B cellsendometriosisendometriumfemale infertilityimmunologyinfertilityrecurrent miscarriage

Identifiers

PMID35146127
PMCPMC8825379
OpenAlexW4205353903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.