Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146042›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Safety and Efficacy of Antibiotic De-escalation and Discontinuation in High-Risk Hematological Patients With Febrile Neutropenia: A Single-Center Experience.

Anke Verlinden, Hilde Jansens, Herman Goossens, Sébastien Anguille, Zwi N Berneman, Wilfried A Schroyens, Alain P Gadisseur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The long-term impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program in febrile neutropenia: an 8 years follow up.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial De-Escalation in Critically Ill Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anke VerlindenDepartment of Haematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Hilde JansensVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Herman GoossensVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sébastien AnguilleDepartment of Haematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Zwi N BernemanDepartment of Haematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Wilfried A SchroyensDepartment of Haematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Alain P GadisseurDepartment of Haematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is currently no consensus on optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in febrile neutropenia. We report on the clinical impact of implementation of antibiotic de-escalation and discontinuation strategies based on the Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4) recommendations in high-risk hematological patients.

methodsWe studied 446 admissions after introduction of an ECIL-4-based protocol (hereafter "ECIL-4 group") in comparison to a historic cohort of 512 admissions. Primary clinical endpoints were the incidence of infectious complications including septic shock, infection-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and overall mortality. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of recurrent fever, bacteremia, and antibiotic consumption.

resultsBacteremia occurred more frequently in the ECIL-4 group (46.9% [209/446] vs 30.5% [156/512];

conclusionsOur results support implementation of ECIL-4 recommendations to be both safe and effective based on real-world data in a large high-risk patient population. We found no increase in infectious complications and total antibiotic exposure was significantly reduced.

Indexed as

antibiotic discontinuationantimicrobial stewardshipfebrile neutropenia

Identifiers

PMID35146042
PMCPMC8826378
OpenAlexW4200240044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.