ArticleCureus2022
Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma Evolved From Pyogenic Granuloma.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- [Peripheral ossifying fibroma. A series of cases].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present article is to present the clinical case of a large peripheral ossifying fibroma that evolved from a previously diagnosed pyogenic granuloma in a 50-year-old woman. The patient was referred for treatment of a lesion over the buccal and palatal gingiva close to the left upper first molar. It was purplish-red in color, approximately 3 cm in diameter, having a smooth surface, a pedicled and bleeding base, with seven years of evolution, and diagnosed as pyogenic granuloma. After three years of evasion, the patient returned reporting an increase in the lesion and difficulty in eating. Clinically the nodule was lobular in appearance, pink in color and smooth, pediculated, firm in consistency, non-bleeding, about 5 cm in its greatest extension, extending to the maxillary tuberosity. The lesion was excised and referred for histopathological examination, which led to the diagnosis of peripheral ossifying fibroma. The patient was followed for approximately 18 months, prosthetically rehabilitated, with satisfactory healing and no clinical signs of recurrence. The possible evolution of a pyogenic granuloma to a peripheral ossifying fibroma was observed in this case, based on the histopathological changes that occurred, with the development of calcified material, fibrous maturation, and decreased vascular content of the initial lesion after three years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.