Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145605›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2022

Urban vs rural - Prevalence of self-reported allergies in various occupational and regional settings.

Linda Tizek, Elisa Redlinger, Johannes Ring, Kilian Eyerich, Tilo Biedermann, Alexander Zink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic mechanisms of pollinosis: interactions between genes and environmental factors.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Linda TizekTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Elisa RedlingerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Johannes RingTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Kilian EyerichTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Tilo BiedermannTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Alexander ZinkTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biedersteinerstraße 29, Munich, 80802, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergies have an enormous individual and economic impact worldwide and affect more than one quarter of the population in Germany. Various factors influence the development of allergies: besides genetic predisposition the environment in which a person is raised and living also plays a role. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in allergy prevalence in relation to age, sex, occupation, and living area (settlement structures).

methodsA cross-sectional study using a paper-based questionnaire about allergies was performed at the Munich Oktoberfest 2016. Participants were divided into 4 occupational groups and compared using descriptive statistics and multiple regression.

resultsOverall, 2701 individuals (mean age 51.9 ± 15.3 years; 53.5% women) participated in the study. The overall rate of any self-reported allergy was 27.3% in the study population, in which women were more likely to be affected than men (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.50; 2.22]). Compared to farmers, all other occupational groups had a higher risk of reporting pollen allergies. Participants from rural areas (OR = 0.38; 95% CI [0.26; 0.58]) and suburban areas (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30; 0.64]) were significantly less affected by allergies than participants from urban areas. Around 45.2% of the participants affected by allergies reported not receiving any treatment at all.

conclusionDifferences in the self-reported prevalence of allergies were shown for age groups, sex, living area, and occupation. Especially the reported pollen allergy prevalence ranged widely between different occupations, indicating that those individuals with an occupational exposure to pollen may have a lower risk than indoor workers. Overall, there remains a high need for sufficient treatment of allergies.

Indexed as

AIT, allergen specific immunotherapyAllergyCI, confidence intervalENT, ear nose throat specialistGP, general practitionerOR, odds ratioOTC, over-the-counterPrevalenceRuralSD, standard deviationTreatmentUrbanZLF, Bavarian Central Agricultural Festival

Identifiers

PMID35145605
PMCPMC8802121
OpenAlexW4210659296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.