Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145598›Full record

SynthesisThe Pan African medical journal2022

Prognostic value of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Imane El Alami, Amina Gihbid, Hicham Charoute, Wafaa Khaali, Selma Mohamed Brahim, Nezha Tawfiq, Rachida Cadi, Khalid Belghmi, Mohammed El Mzibri, Meriem Khyatti

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive Value of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Novel Therapeutic Development for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Imane El AlamiLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.
Amina GihbidLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.
Hicham CharouteLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.
Wafaa KhaaliLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.
Selma Mohamed BrahimLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.
Nezha TawfiqMohammed VI Center for Cancer Treatment, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco.
Rachida CadiLaboratory of Pathophysiology, Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences Ain Chock, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Khalid BelghmiLaboratory of Microbiology, Pharmacology, Biotechnology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences Ain Chock, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Mohammed El MzibriBiology and Medical Research Unit, National Center of Energy, Nuclear Sciences and Techniques Rabat, Morocco.
Meriem KhyattiLaboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of pre and post-Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) DNA load testing and to assess the clinical benefit of using this molecular approach in the prognosis for a better nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) management. Relevant studies were searched in different database until May 2020. Patient´s outcomes overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local-regional-failure-free survival (LRFS), hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from selected studies. The association of pre and post-EBV DNA load and survival outcomes was assessed using review manager and the pooled HRs with 95% CIs were calculated. Twenty-six eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 9966 patients. Pooled HRs showed that EBV DNA levels before and after treatment are significantly associated with survival outcomes, with HR (95% CI) of 2.09 [1.74, 2.51] for OS, 1.77 [1.19, 2.62] for DFS, 2.53 [2.18, 2.92] for DMFS, 1.78 [1.45, 2.19] for LRFS and 2.17 [1.91, 2.47] for PFS in pre-EBV DNA, and an HR (95%) of 4.52 [2.44, 8.36], 4.08 [2.38, 6.99], 5.59 [ 3.58, 8.71] and 8.88 [5.29, 14.90] for OS, DFS and PFS and DMFS in post-EBV DNA, respectively. High pre and post-EBV DNA levels were significantly associated with poor NPC patient´s survival outcomes; which clearly confirm the high interest to introduce viral EBV DNA load as a prognostic biomarker for NPC management.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisDNA, ViralEpstein-Barr virusEpstein Barr Virus DNA loadnasopharyngeal carcinomaprognostic

Identifiers

PMID35145598
PMCPMC8797042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.