ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021
Therapy With Different Dose Regimens of Rituximab in Patients With Active Moderate-To-Severe Graves' Orbitopathy.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of rituximab, tocilizumab, and teprotumumab in Graves' orbitopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Network Meta-Analysis of Different Intravenous Glucocorticoid Regimes for the Treatment of Graves' Orbitopathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- How to manage thyroid eye disease: recent advances - a narrative review.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Early Low-Dose Rituximab for Mild-to-Moderate Thyroid Eye Disease: A Preliminary Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of corticoresistance in patients with thyroid eye disease and use of rituximab as a second-line treatment.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Alemtuzumab-induced thyroid eye disease successfully treated with a single low dose of rituximab.European thyroid journal · 2024Article
- Novel perspectives on the pharmacological treatment of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- A review of TSHR- and IGF-1R-related pathogenesis and treatment of Graves' orbitopathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Management of Thyroid Eye Disease: A Consensus Statement by the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2022Article
- Management of thyroid eye disease: a Consensus Statement by the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association.European thyroid journal · 2022Article
- Rituximab in the treatment of Graves' orbitopathy: latest updates and perspectives.Endocrine connections · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunosuppressive therapy of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is indicated during the active phase of disease. Intravenous steroids (IVGC) are effective in about 70% of patients, although unresponsiveness or relapse are observed. In previous studies, rituximab (RTX) has been shown to be effective in inactivating moderate-to-severe GO when used early in the disease, but its optimal dosage has never been studied in randomized clinical trials. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of RTX, based on a Methods: of 40 patients (35 women, 5 men), with active moderate-to-severe GO treated with RTX, 14 received a single dose of 100 mg (Group 1), 15 a single dose of 500 mg (Group 2) and 11 two 1000 mg doses, administered one week apart (Group 3). Thyroid function, TSH-receptor antibodies (TRAb) and peripheral CD19+ cells were measured. Primary endpoint was disease inactivation, measured as a decrease of the Clinical Activity Score (CAS) of at least two points. Secondary endpoints were improvement of proptosis, diplopia, quality of life and safety. Results: Baseline CAS decreased significantly in all groups (P<0.0001), independently of GO duration or whether patients had newly occurring or relapsing GO after IVGC. Proptosis did not significantly change. There was an inverse correlation between the Gorman score for diplopia and RTX dose (P<0.01). The appearance score of the GO-QoL improved in Group 1 (P=0.015), and the visual function score, in Group 2 (P=0.04). A reduction of serum TRAb was observed in Group 1 (P=0.002) and Group 2 (P<0.0002), but not in Group 3. CD19+ cell decreased in all groups (P<0.01), independently of the dose. Conclusions: We studied the optimal dosage of RTX in the treatment of active moderate-to-severe GO. In this analysis, we considered the efficacy of RTX in inactivating GO, in changing its natural course, its effect on disease severity and on the patients' quality of life. Based on our clinical findings, and balancing the cost of therapy, a single 500 mg dose regimen is suggested in the majority of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.