Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145440›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

The Influence of Stress on Decision-Making: Effects of CRF and Dopamine Antagonism in the Nucleus Accumbens.

Rapheal G Williams, Kevin H Li, Paul E M Phillips

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rapheal G WilliamsCenter for Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, Seattle, WA, United States.
Kevin H LiCenter for Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, Seattle, WA, United States.
Paul E M PhillipsCenter for Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, Seattle, WA, United States.
Behavioral Tech Research, Inc. · USCenter for Excellence in Education · US

Funding

Therapeutic Potential of Kappa Antagonists in the Adjunctive Treatment of Psychotic DepressionP50MH106428 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHAVKIN, CHARLES · 2015 to 2019
$7.6M
Neural mechanisms regulating cocaine consumptionR37DA051686 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PHILLIPS, PAUL E. M. · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Diametric changes in phasic dopamine to contingent and non-contingent drug cues in the regulation of drug taking and drug seekingR01DA039687 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PHILLIPS, PAUL E. M. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039687NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA051686NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The actions of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the core of the nucleus accumbens including increasing dopamine release and inducing conditioned place preference in stress-naïve animals. However, following two-day, repeated forced swim stress (rFSS), neither of these effects are present, indicating a stress-sensitive interaction between CRF and dopamine. To ascertain the degree to which this mechanism influences integrated, reward-based decision making, we used an operant concurrent-choice task where mice could choose between two liquid receptacles containing a sucrose solution or water delivery. Following initial training, either a CRF or dopamine antagonist, α-helical CRF (9-41) and flupenthixol, respectively, or vehicle was administered intracranially to the nucleus accumbens core. Next, the animals underwent rFSS, were reintroduced to the task, and were retested. Prior to stress, mice exhibited a significant preference for sucrose over water and made more total nose pokes into the sucrose receptacle than the water receptacle throughout the session. There were no observed sex differences. Stress did not robustly affect preference metrics but did increase the number of trial omissions compared to their stress-naïve, time-matched counterparts. Interestingly, flupenthixol administration did not affect sucrose choice but increased their nosepoke preference during the inter-trial interval, increased trial omissions, and decreased the total nosepokes during the ITI. In contrast, microinjections of α-helical CRF (9-41) did not affect omissions or ITI nosepokes but produced interactions with stress on choice metrics. These data indicate that dopamine and CRF both interact with stress to impact performance in the task but influence different behavioral aspects.

Indexed as

CRFdecision makingdopaminenucleus accumbensstress

Identifiers

PMID35145440
PMCPMC8821535
OpenAlexW4206940395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.