ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2022
Noise reduction and mask removal neural network for X-ray single-particle imaging.
Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects for coherent X-ray diffraction imaging at fourth-generation synchrotron sources.IUCrJ · 2025Article
- Reduction of artifacts associated with missing data in coherent diffractive imaging.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- Using convolutional neural network denoising to reduce ambiguity in X-ray coherent diffraction imaging.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2024Article
- Patching-based deep-learning model for the inpainting of Bragg coherent diffraction patterns affected by detector gaps.Journal of applied crystallography · 2024Article
- Helium-electrospray improves sample delivery in X-ray single-particle imaging experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Introduction to the virtual collection of papers onJournal of applied crystallography · 2024Article
- A comparison of deep-learning-based inpainting techniques for experimental X-ray scattering.Journal of applied crystallography · 2022Article
- Noise reduction and mask removal neural network for X-ray single-particle imaging.Journal of applied crystallography · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free-electron lasers could enable X-ray imaging of single biological macromolecules and the study of protein dynamics, paving the way for a powerful new imaging tool in structural biology, but a low signal-to-noise ratio and missing regions in the detectors, colloquially termed 'masks', affect data collection and hamper real-time evaluation of experimental data. In this article, the challenges posed by noise and masks are tackled by introducing a neural network pipeline that aims to restore diffraction intensities. For training and testing of the model, a data set of diffraction patterns was simulated from 10 900 different proteins with molecular weights within the range of 10-100 kDa and collected at a photon energy of 8 keV. The method is compared with a simple low-pass filtering algorithm based on autocorrelation constraints. The results show an improvement in the mean-squared error of roughly two orders of magnitude in the presence of masks compared with the noisy data. The algorithm was also tested at increasing mask width, leading to the conclusion that demasking can achieve good results when the mask is smaller than half of the central speckle of the pattern. The results highlight the competitiveness of this model for data processing and the feasibility of restoring diffraction intensities from unknown structures in real time using deep learning methods. Finally, an example is shown of this preprocessing making orientation recovery more reliable, especially for data sets containing very few patterns, using the expansion-maximization-compression algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.