Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145351›Full record

ArticleBioscience2022

Collections Education: The Extended Specimen and Data Acumen.

Anna K Monfils, Erica R Krimmel, Debra L Linton, Travis D Marsico, Ashley B Morris, Brad R Ruhfel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna K MonfilsCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-6430
Erica R KrimmelFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States.
Debra L LintonCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States.
Travis D MarsicoArkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States.
Ashley B MorrisFurman University, Greenville, South Carolina, United States.
Brad R RuhfelUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity scientists must be fluent across disciplines; they must possess the quantitative, computational, and data skills necessary for working with large, complex data sets, and they must have foundational skills and content knowledge from ecology, evolution, taxonomy, and systematics. To effectively train the emerging workforce, we must teach science as we conduct science and embrace emerging concepts of data acumen alongside the knowledge, tools, and techniques foundational to organismal biology. We present an open education resource that updates the traditional plant collection exercise to incorporate best practices in twenty-first century collecting and to contextualize the activities that build data acumen. Students exposed to this resource gained skills and content knowledge in plant taxonomy and systematics, as well as a nuanced understanding of collections-based data resources. We discuss the importance of the extended specimen in fostering scientific discovery and reinforcing foundational concepts in biodiversity science, taxonomy, and systematics.

Indexed as

biodiversity sciencecommunity scienceherbarianatural history collectionsundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID35145351
PMCPMC8824687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.