Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145338›Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2022

Coaching-in-Context With Informal Maternal Care Partners of Children With Spinal Cord Injury.

M J Mulcahey, Nicole Gerhardt, Bernadette Alpajora, Christina Calhoun Thielen, Winnie Dunn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07083713 (Group Coaching for Life Goals in People With Neurological Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07083713 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Group Coaching for Life Goals in People With Neurological Conditions: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsStudents, Spinal Cord Injury, Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, Care GiversArmsGroup Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M J MulcaheyCenter for Outcomes and Measurement & Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nicole GerhardtCenter for Outcomes and Measurement & Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bernadette AlpajoraVirtua Early Intervention Program, Burlington, New Jersey.
Christina Calhoun ThielenCenter for Outcomes and Measurement & Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Winnie DunnDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoaching-in-Context (CinC) is a conversation-based process for working with people that draws on the tenets of positive psychology, is solution-focused and strength-based, and uses evidence-informed coaching techniques that create opportunities for clients to be at their best when engaging in the roles and activities that are desired, required, or expected of them.

objectivesTo explore the use of CinC with informal maternal care partners (mothers, grandmothers) of children with spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsThis study was a multicenter, single group, pre-post treatment design. Participants received up to 10 sessions of CinC over a 10-week period. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF), and Pediatric Measure of Participation Short Form (PMoP SF) were administered before and after coaching. The number of coaching sessions completed, missed, and rescheduled was recorded. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics and to evaluate changed COPM scores. PSI-4-SF stress percentiles were examined descriptively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant change between baseline and postcoaching COPM and PMoP SF scores.

resultsNine caregivers enrolled in the study; two had face-to-face coaching, five had phone coaching, and two dropped out. The seven who completed were mothers with an average age of 37.14 (range, 32-45;

conclusionThis study provides preliminary support for CinC with informal care partners of children with SCI. It also highlights several factors that are important to consider when implementing a coaching program, namely mode of delivery and time commitment.

Indexed as

MentoringSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultCanadaCaregiversChildHumansPatient Carecoachinginformal caregivingpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35145338
PMCPMC8791418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.