Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145302›Full record

ReviewNature genetics2022

The genomic and spatial mobility of extrachromosomal DNA and its implications for cancer therapy.

Eric van Leen, Lotte Brückner, Anton G Henssen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MIR4726Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric van LeenDepartment of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-4803
Lotte BrücknerMax-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Berlin, Germany.
Anton G HenssenDepartment of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. anton.henssen@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-778X
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) amplification has been observed in at least 30 different cancer types and is associated with worse patient outcomes. This has been linked to increased oncogene dosage because both oncogenes and associated enhancers can occupy ecDNA. New data challenge the view that only oncogene dosage is affected by ecDNA, and raises the possibility that ecDNA could disrupt genome-wide gene expression. Recent investigations suggest that ecDNA localizes to specialized nuclear bodies (hubs) in which they can act in trans as ectopic enhancers for genes on other ecDNA or chromosomes. Moreover, ecDNA can reintegrate into the genome, possibly further disrupting the gene regulatory landscape in tumor cells. In this Perspective, we discuss the emerging properties of ecDNA and highlight promising avenues to exploit this new knowledge for the development of ecDNA-directed therapies for cancer.

Indexed as

OncogenesCell NucleusChromosomes, HumanDNA, CircularGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasmsDNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID35145302
OpenAlexW4211214153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.