ArticleScientific reports2022
Towards real-world neuroscience using mobile EEG and augmented reality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- NERV: A comprehensive framework for rapid, reproducible, and hardware-synchronized neuroscience experiment design and execution.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
- EEG entropy modulation as a biomarker of emotion regulation and resilience.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Static vs. Immersive: A Neuromarketing Exploratory Study of Augmented Reality on Packaging Labels.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- NERV: A Comprehensive Framework for Rapid, Reproducible, and Hardware-Synchronized Neuroscience Experiment Design and Execution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Contextual expectations in the real-world modulate low-frequency neural oscillations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Towards predicting posttraumatic stress symptom severity using portable EEG-derived biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-verbal joint action in healthy adults: a systematic scoping review of EEG-hyperscanning research.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- From beeps to streets: unveiling sensory input and relevance across auditory contexts.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Article
- Recording Neural Reward Signals in a Naturalistic Operant Task Using Mobile-EEG and Augmented Reality.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Towards predicting PTSD symptom severity using portable EEG-derived biomarkers.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Comparing episodic memory outcomes from walking augmented reality and stationary virtual reality encoding experiences.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic ultrasound enhances, then reduces, exogenously induced brain activity of mice.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mobile cognition: imaging the human brain in the 'real world'.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Looking at the upper facial half enlarges the range of holistic face processing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Bi-sinusoidal light stimulation reveals an enhanced response power and reduced phase coherence at the visual cortex in migraine.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- A Review of AI Cloud and Edge Sensors, Methods, and Applications for the Recognition of Emotional, Affective and Physiological States.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- AtAwAR Translate: Attention-Aware Language Translation Application in Augmented Reality for Mobile Phones.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual environment impacts multiple aspects of cognition including perception, attention and memory, yet most studies traditionally remove or control the external environment. As a result, we have a limited understanding of neurocognitive processes beyond the controlled lab environment. Here, we aim to study neural processes in real-world environments, while also maintaining a degree of control over perception. To achieve this, we combined mobile EEG (mEEG) and augmented reality (AR), which allows us to place virtual objects into the real world. We validated this AR and mEEG approach using a well-characterised cognitive response-the face inversion effect. Participants viewed upright and inverted faces in three EEG tasks (1) a lab-based computer task, (2) walking through an indoor environment while seeing face photographs, and (3) walking through an indoor environment while seeing virtual faces. We find greater low frequency EEG activity for inverted compared to upright faces in all experimental tasks, demonstrating that cognitively relevant signals can be extracted from mEEG and AR paradigms. This was established in both an epoch-based analysis aligned to face events, and a GLM-based approach that incorporates continuous EEG signals and face perception states. Together, this research helps pave the way to exploring neurocognitive processes in real-world environments while maintaining experimental control using AR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.