ArticleScientific reports2022
A miniature robotic steerable endoscope for maxillary sinus surgery called PliENT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and control of a continuum robot with switchable stiffness based on ball-and-socket joints.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Zero-touch laryngoscopy: a six-DOF robotic platform for remote ENT examination.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- An Actuated Variable-View Rigid Scope System to Assist Visualization in Diagnostic Procedures.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024Article
- User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Scope actuation system for articulated laparoscopes.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Mental workload during endoscopic sinus surgery is associated with surgeons' skill levels.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In endoscopic maxillary sinus surgery, the maxillary sinus is accessed through the nasal cavity which constitutes a narrow and tortuous pathway. However, surgeons still use rigid endoscopes and rigid, straight or pre-bent instruments for this procedure. Resection of the uncinate process and creation of a medial antrostomy is warranted to access the pathology inside the maxillary sinus and depending on the location of the pathology (lateral, inferior or anterior wall), additional resection of healthy tissue and/or functional structures like the lacrimal duct and/or inferior turbinate is necessary to gain optimal access. In order to avoid this additional resection, a functional single-handed, steerable endoscope for endoscopic maxillary sinus surgery has been designed and built. This endoscope is, to our knowledge, the most slender active steerable endoscope ever reported for maxillary sinus surgery. The performance of the endoscope was validated by two surgeons on a cadaver. An increased field of view was found in comparison to currently used endoscopes. As a direct consequence, a reduced need for resection of healthy tissue was confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.