Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145127›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Early experience of laparoscopic resection and comparison with open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multicenter retrospective study.

Shin-Hoo Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Min-Chan Kim, Jeong-Hwan Yook, Tae-Sung Sohn, Woo-Jin Hyung, Seung-Wan Ryu, Yukinori Kurokawa, Young-Woo Kim, Sang-Uk Han and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05938309 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Resection of 5cm or Larger Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

TypeobservationalSponsorFujian Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2028Enrolled194ConditionsGastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
NCT07411118 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Exposed Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) Versus Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER) for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) - an International Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2025 to 2033Enrolled136ConditionsSmall Size Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, GISTArmsEndoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) / Exposed non-tunneling EFTR, Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection (STER) / Exposed tunneling EFTR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. SEOM-GEIS clinical guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Long-term outcomes of a phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in large gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Shin-Hoo ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Hyuk-Joon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea. appe98@snu.ac.kr.
Min-Chan KimDepartment of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jeong-Hwan YookDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-Sung SohnDepartment of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Woo-Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Wan RyuDepartment of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Young-Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Uk HanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Do-Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Wook KimDepartment of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Il LeeDepartment of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Haruhiko ChoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Gyu-Seok ChoDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Jo KimDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ki-Han KimDepartment of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Moon-Won YooDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Han-Kwang YangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advantages of laparoscopic resection over open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are not conclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST, compared to open surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected database of 1019 patients with gastric GIST after surgical resection at 13 Korean and 2 Japanese institutions. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open group, through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The laparoscopic group (N = 318) had a lower rate of overall complications (3.5% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.024) and wound complications (0.6% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.037), shorter hospitalization days (6.68 ± 4.99 vs. 8.79 ± 6.50, P < 0.001) than the open group (N = 318). The superiority of the laparoscopic approach was also demonstrated in patients with tumors larger than 5 cm, and at unfavorable locations. The recurrence-free survival was not different between the two groups, regardless of tumor size, locational favorableness, and risk classifications. Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size larger than 5 cm, higher mitotic count, R1 resection, and tumor rupture during surgery were independent risk factors for recurrence. Laparoscopic surgery provides lower rates of complications and shorter hospitalizations for patients with gastric GIST than open surgery.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35145127
PMCPMC8831629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.