Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35145088›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The microbiome of the buffalo digestive tract.

Feng Tong, Teng Wang, Na L Gao, Ziying Liu, Kuiqing Cui, Yiqian Duan, Sicheng Wu, Yuhong Luo, Zhipeng Li, Chengjian Yang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Feng Tong *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, 528225, Foshan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-0590
Teng Wang *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Na L Gao *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ziying LiuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Kuiqing CuiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Yiqian DuanKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Sicheng WuKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuhong LuoState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Zhipeng LiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Chengjian YangBuffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 24-1Yongwu Road, 530001, Nanning City, P. R. China.
Yixue XuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Bo LinState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Liguo YangKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Alfredo PauciulloDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA) University of Torino Largo Paolo Braccini, 210095, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3140-9373
Deshun ShiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, 530005, Nanning, China.
Guohua HuaKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. huaguohua@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-1023
Wei-Hua ChenKey Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, Hubei, China. weihuachen@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-6147
Qingyou LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, 528225, Foshan, China. qyliu-gene@gxu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-540X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buffalo is an important livestock species. Here, we present a comprehensive metagenomic survey of the microbial communities along the buffalo digestive tract. We analysed 695 samples covering eight different sites in three compartments (four-chambered stomach, intestine, and rectum). We mapped ~85% of the raw sequence reads to 4,960 strain-level metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) and 3,255 species-level MAGs, 90% of which appear to correspond to new species. In addition, we annotated over 5.8 million nonredundant proteins from the MAGs. In comparison with the rumen microbiome of cattle, the buffalo microbiota seems to present greater potential for fibre degradation and less potential for methane production. Our catalogue of microbial genomes and the encoded proteins provides insights into microbial functions and interactions at distinct sites along the buffalo digestive tract.

Indexed as

MetagenomeAnimalsBacteriaCattleDietary FiberDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractGenome, MicrobialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMetagenomicsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDietary FiberDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35145088
PMCPMC8831627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.