Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144991›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2022

European Respiratory Society statement on long COVID follow-up.

Katerina M Antoniou, Eirini Vasarmidi, Anne-Marie Russell, Claire Andrejak, Bruno Crestani, Marion Delcroix, Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan, Venerino Poletti, Nicola Sverzellati, Michele Vitacca and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bridging Gaps in Long COVID Therapy: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Katerina M AntoniouLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece kantoniou@uoc.gr.
Eirini VasarmidiLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Anne-Marie RussellCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0468-3537
Claire AndrejakService de Pneumologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, UR 4294 AGIR, Université Picardie Jules-Verne, Amiens, France.
Bruno CrestaniUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, Physiopathologie et Épidémiologie des Maladies Respiratoires, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-3455
Marion DelcroixDept of Pneumonology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-9809
Anh Tuan Dinh-XuanAP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Respiratory Physiology Unit, Thoracic Diseases Dept, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-5176
Venerino PolettiPulmonology Unit, Thoracic Diseases Dept, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Forli, Italy.
Nicola SverzellatiDivision of Radiology, Dept of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Michele VitaccaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9389-7915
Martin WitzenrathDept of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomy ToniaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Antonio SpanevelloDept of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
University of Crete · GRAarhus University Hospital · DKCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInserm · FRIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITKU Leuven · BEUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection frequently experience symptom burden post-acute infection or post-hospitalisation. We aimed to identify optimal strategies for follow-up care that may positively impact the patient's quality of life (QoL). A European Respiratory Society (ERS) Task Force convened and prioritised eight clinical questions. A targeted search of the literature defined the timeline of "long COVID" as 1-6 months post-infection and identified clinical evidence in the follow-up of patients. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria report an association of characteristics of acute infection with persistent symptoms, thromboembolic events in the follow-up period, and evaluations of pulmonary physiology and imaging. Importantly, this statement reviews QoL consequences, symptom burden, disability and home care follow-up. Overall, the evidence for follow-up care for patients with long COVID is limited.

Indexed as

COVID-19Follow-Up StudiesHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35144991
PMCPMC9349784
OpenAlexW4211216803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.