Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144940›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2022

Factors associated with adherence to using removable cast walker treatment among patients with diabetes-related foot ulcers.

Anas Ababneh, Kathleen Finlayson, Helen Edwards, Peter A Lazzarini

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation and Management of Diabetes-related Foot Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anas AbabnehFaculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan anasnawwaf@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8044-3554
Kathleen FinlaysonSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Helen EdwardsSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Peter A LazzariniSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8235-7964
Queensland University of Technology · AUApplied Science Private University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdherence to using knee-high offloading treatment is critical for healing diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs). However, few studies have investigated patients' adherence to using knee-high offloading treatment. We aimed to investigate the levels and factors associated with adherence to using knee-high removable cast walker (RCW) treatment among patients with DFUs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn this multicenter cross-sectional study, we investigated adherence to using knee-high RCWs in 57 participants with DFUs. All participants were clinically examined for multiple sociodemographic, physiological, and psychosocial factors. Each participant's adherence level to using RCWs was then objectively measured using dual activity monitors (attached to the wrist and RCW) over a 1-week period. Multiple linear regression was undertaken to determine those factors independently associated with adherence levels.

resultsThe mean adherence level to using RCWs was 33.6% (SD 16.5) of weight-bearing activity. Factors independently associated with lower adherence levels were being male, longer diabetes duration, not having peripheral artery disease (PAD), and having higher perceived RCW heaviness (p≤0.05). No associations were found with psychosocial factors.

conclusionsPatients with DFUs adhered to using their RCWs on average for only a third of their prescribed weight-bearing treatment duration. Factors linked to lower RCW adherence levels were being male, longer diabetes duration, not having PAD, and perceived heavier RCWs. These findings highlight the importance of using gold standard non-removable knee-high offloading device treatment. Furthermore, these findings suggest, when gold standard devices are containdicated, that these factors be considered when prescribing the second choice RCW offloading treatment to optimise adherence. Regardless, further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these factors.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePatient ComplianceWeight-BearingWound Healingadherencecompliancediabetic foot

Identifiers

PMID35144940
PMCPMC8845212
OpenAlexW4211066908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.