Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144936›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2022

Data handling practices and commercial features of apps related to children: a scoping review of content analyses.

Lindsay Jibb, Elsie Amoako, Melissa Heisey, Lily Ren, Quinn Grundy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsay JibbLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada lindsay.jibb@sickkids.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-2825
Elsie AmoakoLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa HeiseyLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lily RenLane Medical Library and Knowledge Management Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Quinn GrundyLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild interaction (including via parent proxy) with mobile apps is common, generating concern about children's privacy and vulnerability to advertising and other commercial interests. Researchers have conducted numerous app content evaluations, but there is less attention to data sharing or commercial practices.

objectiveThis scoping review of commercial app evaluation studies describes the nature of such evaluations, including assessments of data privacy, data security and app-based advertising.

methodsWe searched Scopus, PubMed, Embase and ACM Digital Library (2005-2020). We included studies that evaluated the properties of apps available through commercial app stores and targeted children, parents of a child (0-18 years) or expectant parents. Data extracted and synthesised were study and app user characteristics, and app privacy, data sharing, security, advertisement and in-app purchase elements.

resultsWe included 34 studies; less than half (n=15; 44.1%) evaluated data privacy and security elements and half (n=17; 50.0%) assessed app commercial features. Common issues included frequent data sharing or lax security measures, including permission requests and third-party data transmissions. In-app purchase options and advertisements were common and involved manipulative delivery methods and content that is potentially harmful to child health.

conclusionsResearch related to the data handling and the commercial features of apps that may transmit children's data is preliminary and has not kept pace with the rapid expansion and evolution of mobile app development. Critical examinations of these app aspects are needed to elucidate risks and inform regulations aimed at protecting children's privacy and well-being.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsChildComputer SecurityConsumer BehaviorFamilyHumansParentsdata collectionpaediatricstechnology

Identifiers

PMID35144936
PMCPMC9209675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.