Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144921›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

'We are not going to shut down, because we cannot postpone pregnancy': a mixed-methods study of the provision of maternal healthcare in six referral maternity wards in four sub-Saharan African countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aline Semaan, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Dinah Amongin, Ochuwa Babah, Nafissatou Dioubate, Amani Kikula, Sarah Nakubulwa, Olubunmi Ogein, Moses Adroma, William Anzo Adiga and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Aline SemaanDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium asemaan@itg.be.
Aduragbemi Banke-ThomasLSE Health, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Dinah AmonginDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-005X
Ochuwa BabahCollege of Medicine, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.
Nafissatou DioubateDépartement de Santé Publique, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maférinyah, Maférinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Amani KikulaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Sarah NakubulwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Olubunmi OgeinCollege of Medicine, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.
Moses AdromaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
William Anzo AdigaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdourahmane DialloMaternité Ignace Deen, Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Lamine DialloMaternité, Hôpital Régional de Mamou, Mamou, Guinea.
Mamadou Cellou DialloMaternité Ignace Deen, Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Cécé MaomouMaternité, Hôpital Régional de Mamou, Mamou, Guinea.
Nathanael MtinangiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Telly SyMaternité Ignace Deen, Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Thérèse DelvauxDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bosede Bukola AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-7567
Alexandre DelamouDépartement de Santé Publique, Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maférinyah, Maférinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-7106
Annettee NakimuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrea B PembeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Lenka BenovaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Makerere University · UGIgnace Deen Hospital · GNInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Lagos · NGMuhimbili National Hospital · TZGamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry · GNInstitut National de Santé Publique · GNMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZMulago Hospital · UGUniversity of Greenwich · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReferral hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa are located in crowded urban areas, which were often epicentres of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper prospectively assesses how maternal healthcare was provided in six referral hospitals in Guinea, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsMixed-methods design using three data sources: (1) qualitative data from repeated rounds of semi-structured interviews conducted between July 2020 and February 2021 with 22 maternity skilled heath personnel (SHP) on perceptions of care provision; (2) quantitative monthly routine data on caesarean section and labour induction from March 2019 to February 2021; and (3) timeline data of COVID-19 epidemiology, national and hospital-level events. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately, framed based on timeline analysis, and triangulated during reporting.

resultsWe identified three periods: first wave, slow period and second wave. The first wave was challenging for SHP given little knowledge about COVID-19, lack of infection prevention and control training, and difficulties reaching workplace. Challenges that persisted beyond the first wave were shortage of personal protective equipment and no rapid testing for women suspected with COVID-19. We noted no change in the proportion of caesarean sections during the pandemic, and a small increase in the proportion of labour inductions. All hospitals arranged isolation areas for women suspected/confirmed with COVID-19 and three hospitals provided care to women with suspected/confirmed COVID-19. Breastfeeding was not discouraged and newborns were not separated from mothers confirmed with COVID-19. Care provision was maintained through dedication of SHP, support from hospital management and remote communication between SHP.

conclusionRoutine maternal care provision was maintained in referral hospitals, despite first wave challenges. Referral hospitals and SHP contributed to guideline development for pregnant women suspected/confirmed with COVID-19. Maternity SHP, women and pregnancy must always be included in priority setting when responding to health system shocks, including outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCesarean SectionDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2TanzaniaCOVID-19health services researchmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID35144921
PMCPMC8844957
OpenAlexW4211200720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.