ArticleUrologic oncology2022
Survival of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in pediatric patients and young adults - A stage group stratified analysis.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric malignant testicular germ cell tumors: a developmental and comparative perspective.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Review
- Variations in germ cell tumor histology by age and implications for cancer-specific survival among pediatric and adult males: A population-based study.Urologic oncology · 2024Article
- Testicular cancer in adolescents: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical aspects.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTesticular germ cell tumors, particularly nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT), comprise the most common solid malignancy in male children and younger adults. While these patients experience excellent survival outcomes, few studies have characterized their survival by age. Thus, we aimed to characterize the relative survival of NSGCT by age, stratifying patients by stage group.
methodsUsing the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we divided patients with NSGCT into pediatric patients and adolescents (<19 years), young adults (19-30 years), and older adults (>30 years). Survival analysis, using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan Meier curves, described overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of each age category for Stage I-III NSGCT by stage group.
resultsA total of 14,786 patients met inclusion criteria and comprised the age groups <19 years (N=1,287), 19 to 30 years (N=7,729), and >30 years (N=5,770). Stage group distribution at presentation was similar between each group. Survival analysis demonstrated no differences in cancer-specific survival (CSS) among Stage I or II NSGCT. However, among Stage III tumors, multivariable models noted worse CSS in patients >30 years (HR=3.35 (95%CI: 1.45-7.73), P=0.005) and those 19-30 years (HR=2.28 (95%CI: 0.99-5.21), P=0.053) compared to pediatric and adolescent patients.
conclusionsYounger NSGCT patients experience excellent oncologic outcomes compared to their older counterparts. These survival differences by age group are largely driven by differential survival among Stage III neoplasms. Furthermore, our report lends additional evidence that age is an important prognostic factor in advanced NSGCT, including pediatric and adolescent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.