ReviewSeminars in diagnostic pathology2022
Leiomyoma with nuclear atypia: Rare diseases that present a common diagnostic problem.
Review in Seminars in diagnostic pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytoplasmic ERβ Localization and NTS/NTSR1 Expression in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: An Immunohistochemical Insight.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Differentiation of uterine fibroids and sarcomas by MRI and serum LDH levels: a multicenter study of the KAMOGAWA study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Fumarate hydratase mutation associated uterine leiomyomas: A case report and literature review.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Leiomyoma with Bizarre Nuclei: A Current Update.International journal of women's health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Leiomyoma with nuclear atypia describes a group of uterine smooth muscle tumors with a wide range of histologic and clinical presentations and remarkable nuclear atypia. These include fumarate hydratase-deficient leiomyoma (FH-LM), intravenous leiomyomatosis (IV-LM), and leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei (LM-BN). Other uterine mesenchymal tumors, such as perivascular epithelioid tumor (PEComa) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMFT) are the mimickers of leiomyoma with nuclear atypia. LM-BN is the primary tumor model with a long history in gynecologic pathology, but the histogenesis of LM-BN remains largely unknown. Differentiating LM-BN from other benign variants, tumors with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), or fully malignant leiomyosarcoma (LMS) can be diagnostically challenging. Recent progress has improved the diagnosis of many types of leiomyoma with nuclear atypia based on their specific histology and molecular alterations. LM-BN is now a diagnosis of exclusion. In this article, I review the history of leiomyoma with nuclear atypia and compare the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of LM-BN with those of its mimics. In particular, I highlight the current progress made in molecular genetics and pitfalls in the diagnosis of different myogenic tumors with nuclear atypia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.