Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144807›Full record

ArticleInjury2022

Ocular biomechanics during improvised explosive device blast: A computational study using eye-specific models.

Alireza Karimi, Reza Razaghi, Christopher A Girkin, J Crawford Downs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanics of open-globe injury: a review.Biomedical engineering online · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alireza KarimiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: akarimi@uabmc.edu.
Reza RazaghiResearch Department, Heel of Scene Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Christopher A GirkinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: cgirkin@uabmc.edu.
J Crawford DownsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: cdowns@uabmc.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Paul Douglas Gamlin · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
Age-related changes in optic nerve head structure and biomechanicsR01EY018926 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DOWNS, J CRAWFORD, GIRKIN, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2008 to 2015
$2.6M
Optic Nerve Head Mechanobiology in GlaucomaR01EY027924 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DOWNS, J CRAWFORD, MURPHY-ULLRICH, JOANNE E · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018926NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye injuries comprise 10-13% of civilian improvised explosive device (IED) injuries. The bomb blast wave induces a normal and shear forces on the tissues, causing a large acute IOP elevation. This study calculated the biomechanical stresses and strains in the eye due to IED explosion via eye-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models.

methodsBlast occurred at 2, 3, and 4 m from the front and side of the victim and the weights of the IED were 1 and 2 kg. The ground was covered with the deformable soil to mimic the realistic IED explosion condition and reflect the blast wave.

resultsThe IOP elevation of ∼6,000-48,000 mmHg was observed in the eyes while the highest IOP was occurred with the IED weight and distance of 2 kg and 2 m (front) and the lowest was occurred with the IED weight and distance of 1 kg and 4 m (side). Our findings suggest the importance of the victim location and orientation concerning the blast wave when it comes to ocular injury assessment. IOP elevation of ∼2900 and ∼2700 mmHg were observed in ∼1.6 ms after the blast for the IEDS weight of 2 kg and a victim distance of 2 m in front and side blasts, respectively, in consistence with the literature. Nonetheless, IOPs were considerably higher after ∼1.6 ms due to the merging of the bomb blast wave and its reflection off the ground.

conclusionsThe stresses and strains were highest for the frontal blast. Both side and frontal blasts caused higher stresses and strains at the rectus muscle insertions where the sclera is thinnest and prone to rupture. Blast angle has no considerable role in the resultant IOP. Front blast with a heavier IED resulted a higher stresses and deformations in the eye connective tissues compared to the side blast.

Indexed as

Blast InjuriesBombsBiomechanical PhenomenaExplosionsHumansScleraFinite element methodGround reinforcementImprovised explosive devicesIntraocular Pressure

Identifiers

PMID35144807
PMCPMC8940691
OpenAlexW4210755017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.