ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
A hierarchical opportunistic screening model for osteoporosis using machine learning applied to clinical data and CT images.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Value of Image-Based Machine Learning for Osteoporosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence, explainable deep learning, and generative models for osteoporosis and bone disease prediction: a systematic review and future research roadmap.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis across multiple imaging modalities: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of machine learning models integrating spectral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional quantitative parameters for predicting histopathological grade in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Progress in machine learning-assisted medical imaging for osteoarthritis and osteoporosis diagnosis: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Advancing diagnostic equity through artificial intelligence chest radiograph screening for osteoporosis in Asian populations.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in osteoporosis assessment using CT imaging: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A machine-learning-based osteoporosis screening tool integrating the Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method: model development and validation study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Radiomics Model Based on Computed Tomography Image for Predicting the Classification of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Improved Osteoporosis Prediction in Breast Cancer Patients Using a Novel Semi-Foundational Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- The value of machine learning based on spectral CT quantitative parameters in the distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid micro-nodules.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Advanced radiomic prediction of osteoporosis in primary hyperparathyroidism: a machine learning-based analysis of CT images.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Bone density measurement in patients with spinal metastatic tumors using chest quantitative CT deep learning model.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced opportunistic screening of osteoporosis in CT scan: a scoping Review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024Article
- Prediction of osteoporosis using MRI and CT scans with unimodal and multimodal deep-learning models.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024Article
- Channel-Boosted and Transfer Learning Convolutional Neural Network-Based Osteoporosis Detection from CT Scan, Dual X-Ray, and X-Ray Images.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2024Article
- Exploring deep learning radiomics for classifying osteoporotic vertebral fractures in X-ray images.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis is a common metabolic skeletal disease and usually lacks obvious symptoms. Many individuals are not diagnosed until osteoporotic fractures occur. Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for osteoporosis detection. However, only a limited percentage of people with osteoporosis risks undergo the DXA test. As a result, it is vital to develop methods to identify individuals at-risk based on methods other than DXA.
resultsWe proposed a hierarchical model with three layers to detect osteoporosis using clinical data (including demographic characteristics and routine laboratory tests data) and CT images covering lumbar vertebral bodies rather than DXA data via machine learning. 2210 individuals over age 40 were collected retrospectively, among which 246 individuals' clinical data and CT images are both available. Irrelevant and redundant features were removed via statistical analysis. Consequently, 28 features, including 16 clinical data and 12 texture features demonstrated statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between osteoporosis and normal groups. Six machine learning algorithms including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine with radial-basis function kernel, artificial neural network, random forests, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Stacking that combined the above five classifiers were employed as classifiers to assess the performances of the model. Furthermore, to diminish the influence of data partitioning, the dataset was randomly split into training and test set with stratified sampling repeated five times. The results demonstrated that the hierarchical model based on LR showed better performances with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.818, 0.838, and 0.962 for three layers, respectively in distinguishing individuals with osteoporosis and normal BMD.
conclusionsThe proposed model showed great potential in opportunistic screening for osteoporosis without additional expense. It is hoped that this model could serve to detect osteoporosis as early as possible and thereby prevent serious complications of osteoporosis, such as osteoporosis fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.