Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144260›Full record

ReviewUrologia internationalis2022

German S3 Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: The First Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy.

Angelika Borkowetz, Andreas Blana, Dirk Böhmer, Hannes Cash, Udo Ehrmann, Tobias Franiel, Thomas-Oliver Henkel, Stefan Höcht, Glen Kristiansen, Stefan Machtens and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologia internationalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06772116 (Jupiter Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06772116 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Jupiter Registry: Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstitut Mutualiste MontsourisRan2025 to 2032Enrolled1,000ConditionsProstate, Prostate CancerArmsFocal Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Angelika BorkowetzGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Andreas BlanaGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Dirk BöhmerWorking Group Radiooncology German Cancer Society (ARO), Berlin, Germany.
Hannes CashWorking Group of Focal and Microtherapy of the German Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Udo EhrmannBundesverband Prostatakrebshilfe (BPS), Würzburg, Germany.
Tobias FranielWorking Group of Focal and Microtherapy of the German Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Thomas-Oliver HenkelGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Stefan HöchtWorking Group Radiooncology German Cancer Society (ARO), Berlin, Germany.
Glen KristiansenGerman Society of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan MachtensGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Peter NiehoffBerufsverband Deutscher Strahlentherapeuten, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias PenzkoferWorking Group of Focal and Microtherapy of the German Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Michael PinkawaBerufsverband Deutscher Strahlentherapeuten, Berlin, Germany.
Jan Philipp RadtkeWorking Group of Focal and Microtherapy of the German Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Wilfried RothGerman Society of Pathology, Berlin, Germany.
Ullrich WitzschWorking Group of Focal and Microtherapy of the German Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Roman GanzerGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Heinz Peter SchlemmerGerman Röntgen Society, Berlin, Germany.
Marc-Oliver GrimmGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Oliver W HakenbergGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.
Martin SchostakGerman Society of Urology (DGU), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal therapy (FT) is an option to treat localized prostate cancer (PCa) and preserve healthy prostate tissue in order to reduce known side effects from primary whole-gland treatment. The available FT modalities are manifold. Until now, national and international PCa guidelines have been cautious to propose recommendations regarding FT treatment since data from prospective controlled trials are lacking for most FT modalities. Moreover, none of the international guidelines provides a separate section on FT. In this purpose, we provide a synopsis of the consensus-based German S3 guidelines for a possible international use. SUMMARY: The recently published update of the German S3 guidelines, an evidence- and consensus-based guideline, provides a section on FT with recommendations for diagnostic work-up, indications, modalities, and follow-up. This section consists of 12 statements and recommendations for FT in the treatment of localized PCa. KEY MESSAGE: The German S3 guidelines on PCa are the first to incorporate recommendations for FT based on evidence and expert consensus including indication criteria for FT, pretreatment, and follow-up diagnostic pathways as well as an extended overview of FT techniques and the current supportive evidence.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsCryotherapyHumansMaleProspective StudiesCryotherapyEvidenceFocal therapyGuidelinesHigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablationIrreversible electroporationProstate cancerVascular targeted photodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID35144260
PMCPMC9153342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.