Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144226›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

Information trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst middle-aged and older adults in Singapore: A latent class analysis Approach.

Micah Tan, Paulin Tay Straughan, Grace Cheong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Achilles' heel: elderly COVID-19 vaccination policy in China.Health research policy and systems · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Micah TanSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, 178903, Singapore. Electronic address: micahtan@smu.edu.sg.
Paulin Tay StraughanSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, 178903, Singapore. Electronic address: paulints@smu.edu.sg.
Grace CheongSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, 178903, Singapore. Electronic address: llcheong@smu.edu.sg.
Singapore Management University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy presents significant challenges for public health.

objectiveVaccine hesitancy among middle-aged and older adults has been a significant barrier in Singapore's battle against COVID-19. We hypothesize that the trust middle-aged and older adults place in various sources of information influences vaccine hesitancy, and that distinct typologies of trust can be identified to better inform targeted health communication efforts.

methodData from a nationally representative panel survey of Singaporeans aged 56-75 (N = 6094) was utilized. Modules fielded in August and November 2020, and June 2021 were analyzed, assessing social networks, trust in sources of information, and vaccination status respectively. Predictors of vaccination status were first examined. Latent class analysis was then used to identify typologies of trust in various sources of information.

resultsTrust in formal sources of information (e.g government sources) is found to predict vaccination status among respondents. Contrary to expectations, trust in social media and informal sources (family and friends), and perceived social support did not predict vaccination status. Latent class analysis identified 4 typologies of respondents based on their patterns of trust in these sources. Significantly, it is found that a portion of respondents with low trust in formal sources of information have high trust in informal sources. The four distinct typologies of trust in sources of information are also found to predict vaccination status.

conclusionsBecause trust in formal sources of information influences vaccination status, authorities should build trust in such sources to encourage vaccination against COVID-19. However, health communication strategies with middle-aged and older adults who have low levels of trust in the formal sources may be more effective if authorities leveraged alternative channels such as informal sources, including the social networks of such individuals. Overall, the findings suggest the need for targeted communication strategies to encourage vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health CommunicationAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLatent Class AnalysisMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2SingaporeTrustVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35144226
PMCPMC8812088
OpenAlexW4210333506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.