Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35144102›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of medical informatics2022

Establishing a usability cut-point for the health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES).

Kah Poh Loh, Jianfang Liu, Sarah Ganzhorn, Gabriella Sanabria, Rebecca Schnall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06159582 (eSTEP), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06159582 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

eSTEP: An Integrated mHealth Intervention to Engage High-risk Individuals Along the Full PrEP Care Continuum

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled113ConditionsPre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)ArmseSTEP, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Combining human and machine intelligence for clinical trial eligibility querying.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kah Poh LohDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: kahpoh_loh@urmc.rochester.edu.
Jianfang LiuSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, NY, USA. Electronic address: jl4029@cumc.columbia.edu.
Sarah GanzhornSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, NY, USA. Electronic address: sg3657@cumc.columbia.edu.
Gabriella SanabriaCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA. Electronic address: flynng@usf.edu.
Rebecca SchnallSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, NY, USA. Electronic address: rb897@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

The Wise App Trial for Improving Health Outcomes in PLWHR01HS025071 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHNALL, REBECCA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
A novel mobile health exercise intervention for older patients with myeloid neoplasmsR00CA237744 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOH, KAH POH · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Mentoring and Research in Self-Management for Health Promotion and Disease PreventionK24NR018621 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHNALL, REBECCA · 2019 to 2022
$384k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025071NCI NIH HHS R00 CA237744NINR NIH HHS K24 NR018621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) is a validated and reliable instrument to evaluate usability of information technology (IT) tools. In this study, we aimed to establish the optimal cut-point of the Health-ITUES to identify usability of IT tools.

methodsAdult participants were recruited to a trial evaluating a mobile app for self-managing HIV. Participants completed the Health-ITUES at the 3- and 6-month follow-up. Health-ITUES is a 20-item questionnaire that assesses four subscales: impact, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user control. The total score ranged from 1 to 5 and a higher score indicates greater usability. App use was defined as the proportion of activities completed by participants in both study arms. The selection of an optimal cut-point involved a series of multiple linear regression models with 500 bootstrap replications to examine the relationship between the Health-ITUES total score and app use, controlling for potential covariates.

resultsWe included 158 participants; mean age was 49.7 years (SD 10.3), 71% were African American/Black, and 72% were non-Hispanic. Mean Health-ITUES total scores at 3 and 6 months were 4.39 (SD 0.75) and 4.43 (SD 0.75), respectively. App use completedby participants from baseline to the 3-month follow-up visits was 0.61 (SD 0.36, range 0-1.72) and from 3-month to the 6-month follow-up visits was 0.51 (SD 0.37). Participants who reported greater Health-ITUES total score completed more activities [β = 0.18, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.10-0.27]. The optimal cut-point of 4.32 (95% CI: 4.25-4.56) yielded the lowest p-value to identify usability of IT tools.

conclusionsIn this study of adults with HIV, we identified an optimal cut-point of 4.32 on the Health-ITUES total score to define usability. Further studies are needed to validate this cut-point.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsMobile ApplicationsAdultHumansInformation TechnologyMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth-ITUESInformation technologyMobile healthUsability

Identifiers

PMID35144102
PMCPMC8903058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.