Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143706›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2022

Five years of #MedRadJClub: An impact evaluation of an established twitter journal club.

Amanda Bolderston, Kim Meeking, Bev Snaith, Julia Watson, Adam Westerink, Nick Woznitza

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda BolderstonDepartment of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-7900
Kim MeekingTranslational Research in Oncology, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Bev SnaithFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-0889
Julia WatsonQueensland University of Technology and Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Adam WesterinkDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Nick WoznitzaRadiology Department, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-189X
Canterbury Christ Church University · GBRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUTranslational Research in Oncology · CATranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwitter journal clubs are a relatively new adaptation of an established continuing professional development (CPD) activity within healthcare. The medical radiation science (MRS) journal club 'MedRadJClub' (MRJC) was founded in March 2015 by a group of academics, researchers and clinicians as an international forum for the discussion of peer-reviewed papers. To investigate the reach and impact of MRJC, a five-year analysis was conducted.

methodsTweetchat data (number of participants, tweets and impressions) for the first five years of MRJC were extracted and chat topics organised into themes. Fifth anniversary MRJC chat tweets were analysed and examples of academic and professional outputs were collated.

resultsA total of 59 chats have been held over five years with a mean of 41 participants and 483,000 impressions per hour-long synchronous chat. Ten different tweetchat themes were identified, with student engagement/preceptorship the most popular. Eight posters or oral presentations at conferences, one social media workshop and four papers have been produced. Qualitative analysis revealed five core themes relating to the perceived benefits of participation in MRJC: (1) CPD and research impact, (2) professional growth and influencing practice, (3) interdisciplinary learning and inclusion, (4) networking and social support and (5) globalisation.

conclusionMRJC is a unique, multi-professional, global community with consistent engagement. It is beneficial for both CPD, research engagement, dissemination and socialisation within the MRS community.

Indexed as

Social MediaDelivery of Health CareHumansInternationalityOrganizationsEducationinternationalityradiographysocial mediatwitter

Identifiers

PMID35143706
PMCPMC9163464
OpenAlexW4211248058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.