ArticleGenetics2022
Single-cell Iso-Sequencing enables rapid genome annotation for scRNAseq analysis.
Article in Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lineage-specific change in craniofacial gene regulatory networks of syngnathid fishes revealed by integrating multiomics across fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Annotating genomes at increased scale and resolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- The Paipu framework enables creation of a large-scale mammalian cancer transcriptomics atlas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- T2T-CHM13 versus hg38: accurate identification of immunoglobulin isotypes from scRNA-seq requires a genome reference matched for ancestry.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous and novel transcript expression in single cells of patient-derived clear cell renal cell carcinoma organoids.Genome research · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in long-read single-cell transcriptomics.Human genetics · 2024Review
- scGAA: a general gated axial-attention model for accurate cell-type annotation of single-cell RNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in single-cell long-read sequencing technologies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A machine-readable specification for genomics assays.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Respiratory epithelial cell types, states and fates in the era of single-cell RNA-sequencing.The Biochemical journal · 2023Review
- Sex-biased gene expression at single-cell resolution: cause and consequence of sexual dimorphism.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Microevolution of the Stickleback Immune System.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- scTransSort: Transformers for Intelligent Annotation of Cell Types by Gene Embeddings.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Long read single cell RNA sequencing reveals the isoform diversity of Plasmodium vivax transcripts.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing is a powerful technique that continues to expand across various biological applications. However, incomplete 3'-UTR annotations can impede single-cell analysis resulting in genes that are partially or completely uncounted. Performing single-cell RNA sequencing with incomplete 3'-UTR annotations can hinder the identification of cell identities and gene expression patterns and lead to erroneous biological inferences. We demonstrate that performing single-cell isoform sequencing in tandem with single-cell RNA sequencing can rapidly improve 3'-UTR annotations. Using threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus), we show that gene models resulting from a minimal embryonic single-cell isoform sequencing dataset retained 26.1% greater single-cell RNA sequencing reads than gene models from Ensembl alone. Furthermore, pooling our single-cell sequencing isoforms with a previously published adult bulk Iso-Seq dataset from stickleback, and merging the annotation with the Ensembl gene models, resulted in a marginal improvement (+0.8%) over the single-cell isoform sequencing only dataset. In addition, isoforms identified by single-cell isoform sequencing included thousands of new splicing variants. The improved gene models obtained using single-cell isoform sequencing led to successful identification of cell types and increased the reads identified of many genes in our single-cell RNA sequencing stickleback dataset. Our work illuminates single-cell isoform sequencing as a cost-effective and efficient mechanism to rapidly annotate genomes for single-cell RNA sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.