Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143517›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Microdialysis and CO2 sensors detect pancreatic ischemia in a porcine model.

Kristina Rydenfelt, Runar Strand-Amundsen, Rune Horneland, Stina Hødnebø, Gisle Kjøsen, Søren Erik Pischke, Tor Inge Tønnessen, Håkon Haugaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristina RydenfeltDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-3585
Runar Strand-AmundsenDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Engineering, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2224-9355
Rune HornelandDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Section of Transplantation Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Stina HødnebøDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gisle KjøsenInstitute of Clinical medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Søren Erik PischkeDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-3251
Tor Inge TønnessenDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon HaugaaDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic transplantation is associated with a high rate of early postoperative graft thrombosis. If a thrombosis is detected in time, a potentially graft-saving intervention can be initiated. Current postoperative monitoring lacks tools for early detection of ischemia. The aim of this study was to investigate if microdialysis and tissue pCO2 sensors detect pancreatic ischemia and whether intraparenchymal and organ surface measurements are comparable.

methodsIn 8 anaesthetized pigs, pairs of lactate monitoring microdialysis catheters and tissue pCO2 sensors were simultaneously inserted into the parenchyma and attached to the surface of the pancreas. Ischemia was induced by sequential arterial and venous occlusions of 45-minute duration, with two-hour reperfusion after each occlusion. Microdialysate was analyzed every 15 minutes. Tissue pCO2 was measured continuously. We investigated how surface and parenchymal measurements correlated and the capability of lactate and pCO2 to discriminate ischemic from non-ischemic periods.

resultsIschemia was successfully induced by arterial occlusion in 8 animals and by venous occlusion in 5. During all ischemic episodes, lactate increased with a fold change of 3.2-9.5 (range) in the parenchyma and 1.7-7.6 on the surface. Tissue pCO2 increased with a fold change of 1.6-3.5 in the parenchyma and 1.3-3.0 on the surface. Systemic lactate and pCO2 remained unchanged. The area under curve (AUC) for lactate was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.00) for parenchymal and 0.90 (0.83-0.97) for surface (p<0.001 for both). For pCO2 the AUC was 0.93 (0.89-0.96) for parenchymal and 0.85 (0.81-0.90) for surface (p<0.001 for both). The median correlation coefficients between parenchyma and surface were 0.90 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.77-0.95) for lactate and 0.93 (0.89-0.97) for pCO2.

conclusionsLocal organ monitoring with microdialysis and tissue pCO2 sensors detect pancreatic ischemia with adequate correlation between surface and parenchymal measurements. Both techniques and locations seem feasible for further development of clinical pancreas monitoring.

Indexed as

MicrodialysisAnimalsArea Under CurveCarbon DioxideDisease Models, AnimalIschemiaLactic AcidPancreasParenchymal TissueROC CurveSwineCarbon DioxideLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35143517
PMCPMC8830677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.