Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143508›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Forecasting effects of "fast-tracks" for surgery in the Swedish national guidelines for distal radius fractures.

Viktor Schmidt, Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro, Marcus Ottosson, Magnus Tägil, Albert Christersson, Markus Engquist, Arkan Sayed-Noor, Sebastian Mukka, Mats Wadsten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Viktor SchmidtDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8727-9555
Cecilia Mellstrand NavarroDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus OttossonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus TägilDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Albert ChristerssonDepartment of Orthopedics, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Markus EngquistDepartment of Orthopedics, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Arkan Sayed-NoorDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sebastian MukkaDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Mats WadstenDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELund University · SERyhov Hospital Jönköping · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNational guidelines for treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) were presented in Sweden in 2021. In the guidelines, a fast-track is recommended for 4 subgroups of highly unstable DRFs. Regardless of the results of the closed reduction these are recommended for surgery within 1 week of injury. This study aims to evaluate the potential consequences of the newly presented national guidelines on incidence of surgical interventions. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 1,609 patients (1,635 DRFs) with primary radiographs after a DRF between 2014 and 2017 at two Swedish hospitals were included in a retrospective cohort study. An estimation was made of the percentage of patients in the historical pre-guidelines cohort, that would have been recommended early primary surgery according to the new national guidelines compared to treatment implemented without the support of these guidelines.

resultsOn a strict radiological basis, 32% (516 out of 1635) of DRFs were classified into one of the 4 defined subgroups. At 9-13 days follow-up, cast treatment was converted into delayed primary surgery in 201 cases. Out of these, 56% (112 out of 201) fulfilled the fast-track criteria and would with the new guidelines have been subject to early primary surgery.

interpretationThe fast-track regimen in the new guidelines, has a high likelihood of identifying the unstable fractures benefitting from early primary surgery. If the proposed Swedish national guidelines for DRF treatment are implemented, a greater proportion of fractures would be treated with early primary surgery, and a delayed surgery avoided in the majority of cases. The potential benefits in relation to possible costs when using the fast-track criteria in every day practice are still unknown.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAgedFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrognosisRadius FracturesRetrospective StudiesSwedenTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35143508
PMCPMC8830720
OpenAlexW4210986169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.