Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35143497›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Mouse models of Japanese encephalitis virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a meta-regression approach.

Tehmina Bharucha, Ben Cleary, Alice Farmiloe, Elizabeth Sutton, Hanifah Hayati, Peggy Kirkwood, Layal Al Hamed, Nadja van Ginneken, Krishanthi S Subramaniam, Nicole Zitzmann and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Spatial gene expression analysis reveals pathological niches in Japanese encephalitis virus neuroinvasion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Host Factor Rab4b PromotesMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tehmina BharuchaOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-2855
Ben ClearyInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-3255
Alice FarmiloeInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6979-4369
Elizabeth SuttonInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8028-7694
Hanifah HayatiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-8410
Peggy KirkwoodInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-8627
Layal Al HamedInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-9247
Nadja van GinnekenDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Krishanthi S SubramaniamInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1734-9351
Nicole ZitzmannOxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gerry DaviesInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3819-490X
Lance TurtleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBMahosot Hospital · LAUniversitas Gadjah Mada · IDUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013468/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205228/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJapanese encephalitis (JE) virus (JEV) remains a leading cause of neurological infection across Asia. The high lethality of disease and absence of effective therapies mean that standardised animal models will be crucial in developing therapeutics. However, published mouse models are heterogeneous. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of published JEV mouse experiments to investigate the variation in model parameters, assess homogeneity and test the relationship of key variables against mortality. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL

findingsA PubMed search was performed up to August 2020. 1991 publications were identified, of which 127 met inclusion criteria, with data for 5026 individual mice across 487 experimental groups. Quality assessment was performed using a modified CAMARADES criteria and demonstrated incomplete reporting with a median quality score of 10/17. The pooled estimate of mortality in mice after JEV challenge was 64.7% (95% confidence interval 60.9 to 68.3) with substantial heterogeneity between experimental groups (I^2 70.1%, df 486). Using meta-regression to identify key moderators, a refined dataset was used to model outcome dependent on five variables: mouse age, mouse strain, virus strain, virus dose (in log10PFU) and route of inoculation. The final model reduced the heterogeneity substantially (I^2 38.9, df 265), explaining 54% of the variability. CONCLUSION/ SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first systematic review of mouse models of JEV infection. Better adherence to CAMARADES guidelines may reduce bias and variability of reporting. In particular, sample size calculations were notably absent. We report that mouse age, mouse strain, virus strain, virus dose and route of inoculation account for much, though not all, of the variation in mortality. This dataset is available for researchers to access and use as a guideline for JEV mouse experiments.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMiceAnimalsEncephalitis, JapaneseEncephalitis Virus, JapaneseHumans

Identifiers

PMID35143497
PMCPMC8865681
OpenAlexW4211109802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.